APCO25hamradio at Yahoo! Groups

FS: XTS5000 Model III, VHF and yes, it is FPP!

mindset539 — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:22:59 GMT

Greetings, I have the following radios for sale. Shipping, tracking, insurance, battery, antenna, speaker mike and desktop charger are included. 1 - XTS5000,

Re: How are you guys implementing identification of a repeater?

stinger325@... — Wed, 27 May 2009 02:55:55 GMT

Used a ge master two to do that once. Had great sucess but every noise it heard on the input passed right on through. We used a comspec id8. Set to not send cw

Re: How are you guys implementing identification of a repeater?

Brian Gieryk — Wed, 27 May 2009 02:46:57 GMT

Quantar on 2 meters (147 MHz) here in Southern California. Just running the built in CW ID'er in analog, works fine. Good luck on your project. Brian KE6IYC

How are you guys implementing identification of a repeater?

petnrdx@... — Wed, 27 May 2009 02:27:31 GMT

We have been experimenting with a simple repeater passing P25. It is crude, but working. Fortunately, we have access to good test equipment, and have been able

Re: Public Safety and P25

Mutual Aid Supplies, Inc. — Fri, 08 May 2009 18:34:25 GMT

Please reread my last sentence. I already answered that indirectly. ... From: kb6pex Subject: [APCO25hamradio] Re: Public Safety and

Re: Public Safety and P25

kb6pex — Fri, 08 May 2009 12:06:28 GMT

So in your opinion, who is conducting the "Backstage BS" when the Tyco and Tait radios are at Motorola, and the Motorola radios are at Tyco and Tait?

Re: Public Safety and P25

Mutual Aid Supplies, Inc. — Fri, 08 May 2009 04:20:54 GMT

Um well lets see. 3 of them are Motorola. And the 4th is EF Johnson, which is pretty much under Motorola's pants and the only reason they haven't filed for

Re: Public Safety and P25

kb6pex — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:56:47 GMT

There are also independent labs, and since each manufacturer has to cross test with other's radios to verify interoperability, I am not sure how your

Re: Public Safety and P25

kb6pex — Fri, 08 May 2009 03:56:31 GMT

I believe much of what you are describing has more to do with an attempt at maintaining compatibility with generations of product prior to the release of the

Re: Public Safety and P25

Mutual Aid Supplies, Inc. — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:39:14 GMT

"demonstrating their testing competence and their ability to operate independently, even if they are owned by P25 manufacturers, Berndt said." Yea right

Re: Public Safety and P25

retiredbynow — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:27:47 GMT

The labs were announced today http://urgentcomm.com/test_and_measurement/news/p25-compliance-labs-approved-200\ 90507/ I was amazed that Congress had to pass a

Re: Public Safety and P25

Nate Duehr — Thu, 07 May 2009 20:19:59 GMT

... I don't have any dog in this fight, but from my experience in the audio/videoconferencing world, there's option 2... they'll just throw an asterisk on the

Re: Public Safety and P25

nj902 — Thu, 07 May 2009 19:49:28 GMT

Variations in the way different manufacturers implement P25 features should become less of an issue now that there is a process for verification. The NIST has

Re: Public Safety and P25

Doug Bade — Thu, 07 May 2009 13:21:35 GMT

Well you parsed the thread email awful tight but if the thread is still about what I think it is, emergency clearing is a good example. In APCO P25 on vendor T

Re: Public Safety and P25

kb6pex — Thu, 07 May 2009 11:44:18 GMT

... . . . . .> ... Example please?