ARMATI at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Clarification of period dates

RODGER WILLIAMS — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:49:37 GMT

Done. Thanks. There are some oddities...found Gupta Indian in AoE.... Cheers Rodge 2009/11/11 mark584036 ... [Non-text portions of

Re: Clarification of period dates

mark584036 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:57:03 GMT

Rodger - post the question on Warflute - the WF Senate does have some general guide-lines & tends to re-classify list submissions that obviously fall out of

Re: Clarification of period dates

Mark Grindlay — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:26:28 GMT

I'd use the armies listed first and last in each section of the pblished rules as the guide. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Clarification of period dates

rodger1uk — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:04:19 GMT

Thanks Mark. Judgement call then. Reason for the question was where there are dates that have to be guessed at I wondered if there were guidelines that would

Re: Clarification of period dates

sfp55@... — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:23:24 GMT

In a message dated 11/9/2009 3:46:01 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, mark.grindlay@... writes: I wouldn't have put dates on it, more developments and a

Re: Clarification of period dates

Mark Grindlay — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:45:53 GMT

I wouldn't have put dates on it, more developments and a key exponent force. Antiquity seems to kick off with the Persians. Vincent and I discussed it a

Clarification of period dates

rodger1uk — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:17:16 GMT

Is there a consensus on the dates we should work to (start and end) for Biblical Antiquity AoE ToC AoE and what are they please? Cheers Rodge

Re: Tournament Numbers

auger_1964 — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:53:03 GMT

I am definitely a tournament player, although I also enjoy big historic battle reconstitution. I do not think that Armati is providing us with a good "equal

Re: Digest Number 4017

Mark Watson — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:56:46 GMT

I keep a league table of material submitted to Slingshot since I started as editor. Overall (by word count), Armati is 6th, behind (first to fifth) DBA, FoG,

Re: Digest Number 4017

Graham Bryson — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:23:53 GMT

I cannot see the point of this debate. Everyone, competition or non-competition player plays for fun. I, and others prefer Armati for a number of reasons.

Re: Tournament Numbers

ashley.solo — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:58:46 GMT

I am a solo player (not tournament, not standard game) and play intro scale. i have drifted away from Armati since the interetsing discussions on rule

Re: Tournament Numbers

durulz2000 — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:45:36 GMT

... -Yeah, you did. Sorry to disagree with you, but I think scenario books are a poor example of support. -Maybe. Tournament players wouldn't be so

Re: Tournament Numbers

ltcjones@... — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:04:29 GMT

Actually I did not answer my own question. Sorry to disagree with you, but I think scenario books are a poor example of support. The availability of the

Re: Tournament Numbers

durulz2000 — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:23:29 GMT

... -You answered this yourself in your last question. I would also suggest that scenario books are another form of support. Consistent availability would be

Re: Tournament Numbers

ltcjones@... — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:16:36 GMT

I have to chime in and ask a few questions, I may be missing something on this. What does it mean that (Armati 2 was never supported that well in the