<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AT91SAM at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/</link>
    <description>AT91SAM</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:31:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>M P</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4764</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4764</guid>
      <description>What do you mean by &quot;dataflash&quot; ? SPI ? Well SPI ones are tiny, compared to the gigantic NAND you can get for cheap... Michael On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: issue with loading linux using U-boot</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:15:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Lyke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4763</guid>
      <description>On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:34:12 &#43;0530 ... Right. ROMBoot will go look at your various devices and attempt to load a boot image off of each of them. ... Correct.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paulo Silva(OpenSoftware)</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4762</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4762</guid>
      <description>Hi guys... Why using nand seems to be prefered than using dataflash? Speed? PSilva</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Lyke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4761</guid>
      <description>On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:42:10 -0000 ... Yes. We had this problem with AT91SAM9261 parts. We had to find &quot;B&quot; revision parts to boot off the NAND. Dan</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:27:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vellemans, Noel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4760</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4760</guid>
      <description>Hi, take a look at PROPOX. http://www.propox.com/products/t_232.html Regards Noel. ________________________________ From: AT91SAM@yahoogroups.com</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>issue with loading linux using U-boot</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:04:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>suse auto</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4759</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4759</guid>
      <description>hi, i am using at91SAM 9263EK eval board (Rev B). I have compiled the linux kernel 2.6.30 with at91 patches. was able to create uImage using mkimage.bin the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>M P</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4758</guid>
      <description>Thanks guys; so it seems it&#39;s a better deal to boot from NAND directly. Does anyone know of a devboard (apart from the -EK) using the G20 in that &quot;minimalist&quot;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chen, Weiguo (GE, Research)</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4757</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4757</guid>
      <description>Yes, If you boot on embedded ROM. it supports dataflash (not Atmel&#39;s at25/26df series), nandflash, SD. Weiguo ________________________________ From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gnuarm</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4756</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4756</guid>
      <description>I suggest that you research this in the errata.  I remember that the earlier SAM9 parts could not boot from several devices that were listed as boot devices in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>vishnu Tadepalli</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4755</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4755</guid>
      <description>Hi, 16/32 MB of SDRAM should be perfect. Try using 8/16MB of serial data flash instead of NOR flash.I think AT91sam9 is capable of booting from dataflash. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux compilation for AT91SAM9263</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:08:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Reaves</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4754</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4754</guid>
      <description>Hi Dan! I recently signed up for the AT91SAM Yahoo list after a recent debacle in my company. When I saw your note on the list I immediately wondered if you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:41:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paulo Silva(OpenSoftware)</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4753</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4753</guid>
      <description>I did a project for a customer, with: 32MBytes of SDRAM. 4MBytes of dataflash for u-boot(?)&#43;kernel&#43;initrd Hope this help.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Minimal system for at91sam9*</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>M P</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4752</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4752</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m looking into running a minimal at91sam9 . I&#39;ve been trying to figure out how much minimal resources it would need to be reliable. + 16 or 32B SDRAM for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux compilation for AT91SAM9263</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karthi k</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4751</guid>
      <description>hai friend i am karthik, now i am develop one linux based module that basic what is the step? reply kaarthiik.s To: AT91SAM@yahoogroups.com From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux compilation for AT91SAM9263</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dan Lyke</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4750</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AT91SAM/message/4750</guid>
      <description>On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:16:26 &#43;0530 ... Buildroot is a set of Makefiles that you configure, and then it goes and downloads source trees, and then builds the</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Dec  4 11:31:06 PST 2009 -->
