<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AgileEmbedded at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/</link>
    <description>Agile Embedded</description>

    <item>
      <title>vanilla XP not a good fit for embedded?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marktxx</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/453</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/453</guid>
      <description>I agree with this poster that vanilla XP is not a good fit for complex embedded systems.  If no systems design is done (including some SW architecture) before</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: User stories and customers/users</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:47:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hagar, Jon D</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/452</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/452</guid>
      <description>Exactly. And this idea has power, but may have limitations (e.g. how class to the real hardware is the engineer?). ... From: AgileEmbedded@yahoogroups.com</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: User stories and customers/users</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/451</guid>
      <description>What this means to an agile team, whose embedded application involves many actors, is that a single person playing the role of the customer is likely to not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Iintroducing myself</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>karl_l_hofmann</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/450</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/450</guid>
      <description>Hello all, I&#39;m a hw/sw engineer working on safety-critical train control systems. Our business is a mixture of project development and product development. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Introducing myself</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Greg Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/449</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/449</guid>
      <description>Piet, Welcome to the group! You can search through our previous posts, since this has been asked previously. We have some papers and presentations that had</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing myself</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:13:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pietcordemans</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/448</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/448</guid>
      <description>Hi, I&#39;m Piet, currently a research associate of the catholic university college of Bruges/Ostend (Belgium). I&#39;m currently working on a project to transfer</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: User stories and customers/users</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hagar, Jon D</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/447</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/447</guid>
      <description>One problem with Agile in embedded I have seen is the nature of what is a &quot;user&quot;.  I follow James Whittaker view that a user/customer can be anything/one -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Please change subject from Digest  Re: Digest Number 232</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marktxx</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/446</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/446</guid>
      <description>When replying to a Digest message please take a moment to change the subject to an appropriate message title. Many folks like to follow the messages by thread</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digest Number 236</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:18:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nancy Van Schooenderwoert</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/445</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/445</guid>
      <description>Hi Jack! Nice to see you here in this little group. You&#39;re right to point out that it can be too vague to just say &quot;some testing&quot;, but if the team is really</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digest Number 236</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:18:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Greg Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/444</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/444</guid>
      <description>Jack, I definitely agree with your argument, and I definitely push for 100% test coverage. I want to clarify that I specifically meant that some test </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digest Number 236</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jack Ganssle</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/443</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/443</guid>
      <description>The idea of automated testing is tremendously appealing but very hard in the embedded world. But it scares me when we talk about &quot;some testing being better</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How much design? (was Re: XP for scientific instruments)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:54:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Greg Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/442</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/442</guid>
      <description>One topic that I see left out of this discussion that I want to add is Continuous Integration (CI). A precursor to being able utilize CI is to have tests that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How much design? (was Re: XP for scientific instruments)</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/441</guid>
      <description>Hi Stephen I&#39;ll add a little to Nancy&#39;s sound advice on design... One important realization on the journey from a BDUF approach to an iterative and agile</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XP for scientific instruments -  was: Re: [AgileEmbedded] Digest Num</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:31:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nancy Van Schooenderwoert</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/440</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/440</guid>
      <description>Hi Stephen, You&#39;ve certainly brought up a number of key areas where embedded folks tend to get tripped up when they are new to Agile and XP. I think I can give</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digest Number 232</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:05:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/439</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/439</guid>
      <description>Hi Steve Thanks for the detailed account of your experiences. It seems like there are numerous things we could talk about.  After a quick scan it seems that</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov 21 18:25:14 PST 2009 -->
