<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AgileEmbedded at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/</link>
    <description>Agile Embedded</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Embedded survey</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:47:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan Dayley</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/506</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/506</guid>
      <description>Hello, The first question creates a false categorization of a person.  I work in a company that serves several of the listed industries with the exact same</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Embedded survey</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>pietcordemans</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/505</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/505</guid>
      <description>Hi all, I invite you to participate in a survey on embedded technology. This survey is part of the research I am conducting in the field of development methods</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CFP: STARWEST 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Greg Williams</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/504</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/504</guid>
      <description>Jon, We&#39;ve done a lot of work on automated unit and system testing of embedded systems and have presented this work at the ESC a couple of times. It sounds </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CFP: STARWEST 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hagar, Jon D</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/503</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/503</guid>
      <description>STARWest (SQE sw testing conference) is looking for track presentations and 1 day tutorials on testing embedded and mobile systems.  If you are interested,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of Fitnesse with Visual C&#43;+ (VS 2008)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:29:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/502</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/502</guid>
      <description>James, I have this partially working now (I can get some of the Fitnesse Tests provided with the CSlim Test Fixtures to pass). However, I see some things that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of Fitnesse with Visual C&#43;+ (VS 2008)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:13:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/501</guid>
      <description>If it is variable declarations not at the beginning of a scope, please feel free to move them. For things like snprintf, see if you can wrap the dependencies.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of Fitnesse with Visual C&#43;+ (VS 2008)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/500</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/500</guid>
      <description>James, Thanks for the quick response. Actually, the biggest problem appears to be variable declarations sprinkled throughout the &quot;C&quot; function code. While C&#43;&#43;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Use of Fitnesse with Visual C&#43;+ (VS 2008)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:29:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/499</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/499</guid>
      <description>Hi C Are you named after the programming language? I expect that the biggest problem will be the sockets communication. Doug (and Bob?) did the work on that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use of Fitnesse with Visual C&#43;+ (VS 2008)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/498</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/498</guid>
      <description>I have been using TDD with Visual Studio to cross compile C&#43;+ code intended for various 8, 16 and 32-bit targets. I am looking for any recommendations as to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone using BDD?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/497</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/497</guid>
      <description>I might be wrong, but BDD is not as broad a topic as FDD.  BDD is more about how you describe the system behavior (the tests) in a domain specific language. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone using BDD?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marktxx</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/496</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/496</guid>
      <description>... Feature Driven Development (FDD) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feature_Driven_Development has been around for quite a while so maybe something similarly</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestion</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>marktxx</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/495</guid>
      <description>If you are starting a new topic please don&#39;t reply to an existing topic. I read this through Yahoo Groups (not email) and the new topic gets buried. example</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Agile with fixed price contracts</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Todd Turner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/494</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/494</guid>
      <description>Sounds interesting.  I&#39;ll pick it up. Thanks, Todd ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: if you do more integrating than developing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hagar, Jon D</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/493</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/493</guid>
      <description>I know the terms are out there, I just poked at them  now in the forum to see if they will survive.  We are seeing changes as Agile matures.  It seems like</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: if you do more integrating than developing</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:50:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Grenning</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/492</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/492</guid>
      <description>I find the distinctions helpful inasmuch as they might provide a term to help guide someone in how to approach their problem. A common term helps people find</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 12:32:35 PDT 2010 -->
