http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/ Agile Embedded Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:39:13 GMT Jevin Maltais http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/411 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/411 So I'm playing with the Model Conductor Hardware architecture. I'm sure there's merit to this architecture but I'm still trying to grasp it. I've read Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:32:30 GMT marktxx http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/410 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/410 ... What do you consider a "CI system" is in the embedded world using C and/or C++ (with a little assembly) as the development language? Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:50:36 GMT Greg Williams http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/409 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/409 Mark, It is a tough choice to find the right balance of unit, integration, and system level testing. You really need to have some type of full end-to-end suite Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:08:10 GMT James Grenning http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/408 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/408 Hi Mark Integration is a pretty broad term, and there are many levels. Some amount can be done off target. But the ultimate, and maybe unattainable in some Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:13:05 GMT marktxx http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/407 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/407 ... As mentioned in other posts as well, IMHO real integration can only be run on the target or with a target simulation. In the embedded world, running the Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:35:22 GMT Nancy Van Schooenderwoert http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/406 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/406 Hi - This is to let those of you in the Boston area know of our next Agile Bazaar meeting - we've got Ken Schwaber as our speaker. Details are below. Mark your Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:44:29 GMT Greg Williams http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/405 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/405 Bas, Yes, we are definitely saying the same thing. My original point was that the last place to scrimp is on your CI server. Yes, please feel free to use GCC Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:43:02 GMT James Grenning http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/404 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/404 Hi I agree with needing the fast turn around build during unit tests, like Bas explains. Why? To get feedback sooner and avoid debugging. The longer the Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:08:21 GMT Bas Vodde http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/403 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/403 Hi Greg, Hmm... yeah... I understand. Though, I agree with all you are saying, I wouldn't make the same recommendations. Perhaps its just the context here, Mon, 01 Jun 2009 19:16:00 GMT Greg Williams http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/402 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/402 Bas, No, sorry if it came across that way. I am basically saying that it is better to use the compiler you are using for your embedded target if it has a Sat, 30 May 2009 01:12:14 GMT Bas Vodde http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/401 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/401 Hi Greg, I'm unclear what you mean with this mail? Could you clarify it a little further? Are you saying to not use any of these compilers? Bas Sat, 30 May 2009 01:08:12 GMT Bas Vodde http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/400 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/400 So now you tell us there is a top 5 without telling what it is ? :) I won't be able to join, but do hope you tell use the Top 5 afterwars :P Bas Fri, 29 May 2009 18:25:39 GMT Rick http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/399 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/399 gcc and g++ work well for embedded applications. I've built applications with gcc and glibc that ran fine on my desktop. The same applications cross compiled Fri, 29 May 2009 17:26:44 GMT Greg Williams http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/398 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/398 Dave, If you are insistent with going with a non-embedded compiler, I would definitely lean towards GCC over anything else. Especially something from Fri, 29 May 2009 17:23:47 GMT Mark Vander Voord http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/397 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AgileEmbedded/message/397 Dave: Of the two, I agree with James: gcc is probably going to be easier (maybe MinGW instead of Cygwin just to keep it simple?). I believe, however, that