<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Apropos-List at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/</link>
    <description>Apropos Users Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone have batch escalation loader?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:13:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carol Barmes Labedz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/990</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/990</guid>
      <description>I haven&#39;t done it recently, but if you analyze the MessageTool for traffic when you add an escalation rule, you might be able to use the MessageTool to create</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone have batch escalation loader?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:08:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Rowe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/989</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/989</guid>
      <description>Thanks Carol, It&#39;s going from one regional Africa &lt;product&gt; queue to another regional Europe &lt;product&gt; queue with an Email, Outbound and live queues.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone have batch escalation loader?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carol Barmes Labedz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/988</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/988</guid>
      <description>Sorry, it&#39;s Carol : )  In any case, do you have the utility available?  I don&#39;t remember which version they added this into and I don&#39;t remember which version</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone have batch escalation loader?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Rowe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/987</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/987</guid>
      <description>Thanks Mike, only thing is it isn&#39;t the same queue, (be too easy). David Rowe From: Apropos-List@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Apropos-List@yahoogroups.com] On</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone have batch escalation loader?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:54:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mrsjimmyb</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/986</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/986</guid>
      <description>Depending on what version of 6 you are on, you can create the two escalation rules for only one of your queues.  Then you can use the Utility to copy queue</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anyone have batch escalation loader?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Rowe</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/985</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/985</guid>
      <description>I have 120  queues I have to add 2 escalations each to. David Rowe ... Customer Support IT Manager Landmark 2107 CityWest Boulevard, Bldg. 2 Houston, Texas</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Programmatic creation of Interaction Properties</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:34:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cblabedz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/984</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/984</guid>
      <description>Greetings, My understanding is that if the property is not created in ConfigMan, it will not get stored anywhere.  When the property is created in ConfigMan,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Programmatic creation of Interaction Properties</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>calvin francart</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/983</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/983</guid>
      <description>Hi Ashley, As I understand it, the SetKeyValue command will write to the contactinfo table if the following criteria are met: 1) the key value already exists</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Programmatic creation of Interaction Properties</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ashley_pulse</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/982</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/982</guid>
      <description>Hi All If i use the ati.SetKeyValue api method to set an Interaction Property value of an interaction and it is not created in Config Manager, is this value</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Manager&#39;s vs. Agents reporting</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>calvin francart</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/981</guid>
      <description>Hi Candice. Using a Workgroup to restrively select the agents to report on is definitely the right way to do this. If the report you are using does not allow</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Manager&#39;s vs. Agents reporting</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:42:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Candice Shine</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/980</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/980</guid>
      <description>Not sure if I am asking for something that exists or not but will put it out there for feedback. Scenario: Our manager&#39;s and supervisor&#39;s are also agents when</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forcing both Chat and Calls</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cblabedz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/979</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/979</guid>
      <description>Greetings, Sorry for not responding in closer proximity to the other messages, but I had a quick suggestion to make.  I do not recall running into this issue</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>sizing tool/formula for Chats</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>grsullivan_2000</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/978</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/978</guid>
      <description>does anyone have a suggestion on how we might be able to project system load (network, memory, cpu) for Chat? we checked with Apropos and they had no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forcing both Chat and Calls</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Greg Sullivan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/977</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/977</guid>
      <description>I&#39;d say, Candace, your assumptions may be correct particular to your environment, and may not be correct particular to ours. If I understand what you are</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Forcing both Chat and Calls</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Candice Shine</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/976</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Apropos-List/message/976</guid>
      <description>Not sure but I don&#39;t see how the system can force an interaction if the agent is already engaged in an interaction.  Doesn&#39;t it look for &#39;available agents &#39; in</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Dec  4 14:08:29 PST 2009 -->
