<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AstronomyWeather at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/</link>
    <description>AstronomyWeather</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: New Nebula on the cosmo couch.  LOL!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Attilla</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/249</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/249</guid>
      <description>... Glad to hear you like the forecasts. Welcome to the group.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Nebula on the cosmo couch.  LOL!</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kmel_tortelli</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/248</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/248</guid>
      <description>Hey I tried.  I have been using the clear sky charts since I found them. They are very useful especially this time of year and around March. That is when we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Smoke</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Attilla Danko</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/247</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/247</guid>
      <description>Thanks Allan. I&#39;ll have to quote you when the complaints about transparency accuracy start rolling in. :) ... -- attilla danko, danko@...,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smoke</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 01:24:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>allan_rahill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/246</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/246</guid>
      <description>Actually, there is a large smoke plume covering all Sakatchewan, southern Manitoba, Dakotas and moving toward the great lakes tonight and possibly over</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No activity since 2009?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ling,Alister [Edm]</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/245</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/245</guid>
      <description>The sign of a robust, well-designed application that nailed user needs! About the only thing left is improve the models. Good observing, Alister. ... From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No activity since 2009?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:50:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Attilla Danko</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/244</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/244</guid>
      <description>Yup. This group has been quiet. To my surprise, yahoo has not tried to delete it for lack of activity. -ad ... [Non-text portions of this message have been</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No activity since 2009?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>PinkSplice</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/243</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/243</guid>
      <description>Just checking</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New weather model feeding the CSC....</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:36:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allan Rahill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/242</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/242</guid>
      <description>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Patrice Scattolin wrote: Hi Patrice, Of course the score of the new model shows some improvement with weather systems mainly over the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New weather model feeding the CSC....</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Patrice Scattolin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/241</guid>
      <description>Ok, I&#39;ll bite, if nothing has changed, what has improved? I am guessing that the model is more accurate over longer periods, since the Environment Canada web</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New weather model feeding the CSC....</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>allan_rahill</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/240</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/240</guid>
      <description>Hi, Thursday 12th, we implemented a new GEM regional weather model with a new grid extending a bit further north and south (thus bigger) but it has no impact</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GFS data coordinates query</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:43:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/239</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/239</guid>
      <description>Hello All, I have a query on GFS data coordinates. In a GFS INFO file it states that :- Longitude: 0.00000000000°E to 359.50000000000°E (720 points, avg. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: online charts</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:21:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Attilla Danko</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/238</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/238</guid>
      <description>This website has low-res cloud cover summaries by month: &lt;http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ignatius/CloudMap/&gt; Sponsored clear sky chart locations have a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>online charts</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Neal Minnick</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/237</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/237</guid>
      <description>Can anyone point me to an online resource which gives a graphic depiction of monthly cloudcover for North America? I&#39;m looking for averages, not real-time</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SkippySky</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/236</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/236</guid>
      <description>Hello All, Today I&#39;ve added Europe and North America to my SkippySky (TM) website at www.skippysky.com.au SkippySky uses the NOAA/NCEP/GFS data like so may</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Astronomy Weather Algorithms</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:09:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Attilla Danko</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/235</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstronomyWeather/message/235</guid>
      <description>I can&#39;t speak for all canadians. But I can say that the Canadian Meterological Center (CMC) does not use the phrase &quot;clear sky chart&quot;. I do. I won&#39;t be suing</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Mon May 20 05:54:50 PDT 2013 -->
