CANbus at Yahoo! Groups

[CANLIST] canopen fuzzing

bertil bäck — Wed, 15 May 2013 07:00:40 GMT

Hi, anybody here that have any experience with fuzzing CANopen. Is there any papers to read? Or any that can help with ideas for test specification. Some

Re: [CANLIST] Who uses 10kbps and 20kbps with CANopen?

John Dammeyer — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:33:17 GMT

Hi Simon, I used 10k and 20k bps for my CANRF product but that's only because the On Off Keying modulation could not support the RF transceiver turning around

Re: [CANLIST] Who uses 10kbps and 20kbps with CANopen?

Bruce Decker — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:53:41 GMT

Hello Simon, Rail vehicles use the lower bit rates because of their length. There may be other uses, but of this use I am certain. Sincerely, Bruce Decker

[CANLIST] Who uses 10kbps and 20kbps with CANopen?

Simon Byholm — Fri, 19 Apr 2013 10:24:35 GMT

Hello We are considering what bitrates to support in a CANopen device to be mounted on off highway vehicles. Do anyone know if these bitrates are used in

[CANLIST] 14th international CAN Conference

Heinz-Jürgen Oertel — Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:58:47 GMT

Have you already heard about it? The next international CAN Conference takes place on November 12 and 13, 2013. Details about it at:

Re: [CANLIST] Practical setup of the CAN physical layer in automobil

David Harris — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:37:51 GMT

It is ok, but may reduce the over-all length possible for the network. The stars need to limit the length between the star and the node (each stub length

Re: [CANLIST] Practical setup of the CAN physical layer in automobil

Dinesh Guleria — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:50:41 GMT

... But how can a star network be possible with a serial CAN bus protocol ? Regards, Dinesh ... Regards, Dinesh On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Tom <

Re: [CANLIST] Practical setup of the CAN physical layer in automobil

Tom — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:44:48 GMT

SC> I am currently working with a vehicle prototype where all CAN SC> lines are connected in a star point. I cannot imagine that this SC> is the way it would

[CANLIST] Practical setup of the CAN physical layer in automobiles

Sueltrop Christian — Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:08:23 GMT

Hello, Literature on the CAN bus usually only explains how the CAN bus should work in theory, but I am wondering how the physical layer of the CAN busses in

Re: [CANLIST] question about can bus

Steinhoff — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:32:34 GMT

... The "talking device" is using a line protocol and is expecting at least an ACK signal from the receiving stations. No ACK means the bus is dead ... so you

Re: [CANLIST] question about can bus

Kees Zagers — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:59:17 GMT

Hi Jean Francois, Question is clear now. It is the arbitration, which is the problem. CANbus solved this by AMP (arbitration on message priority). Read more in

Re: [CANLIST] question about can bus

Simon Byholm — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:52:23 GMT

Hello Jean-Francois This is not according to CAN, but if you have no other choice you could always have the PC send out requests Slave 1 please report your

Re: [CANLIST] question about can bus

Heinz-Jürgen Oertel — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:36:19 GMT

... The 'real' CAN controller does this by supervising the CAN bus and sends (using TX) only if the bus is free - some bit times recessive. If more than one

Re: [CANLIST] question about can bus

Heinz-Jürgen Oertel — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:29:14 GMT

Hello Jean-Francois ... This sounds strange to me. A CAN transceiver alone does nothing on the bus. It always depends what the signal at the TX input are. So

Re: [CANLIST] question about can bus

Lacassaigne Jean-Francois — Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:29:04 GMT

Hi, thanks for your reply. while reading it, i realize that i was not really clear in my question. I'm using only the physical layer of the can bus (not the