<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CanonFD at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/</link>
    <description>A forum for owners of Canon FD cameras</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: FD Camera Body with Mechanical Bulb Setting?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dncswclds1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60393</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60393</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD Camera Body with Mechanical Bulb Setting?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:21:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Engel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60392</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60392</guid>
      <description>F1 (original-old version) B works without battery. F1 has multiple view finders, view screens, motor drives, on and on. The &quot;old&quot; F1 is built like a brick sh_t</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD Camera Body with Mechanical Bulb Setting?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>rodgimenez</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60391</guid>
      <description>The 1981 Canon F1 can use speeds B and 1/90 to 1/2000 mechanical. All Canon F1 versions have the 6x loupe finders, that are brighter and have more</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD Camera Body with Mechanical Bulb Setting?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Click! fotografia</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60390</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60390</guid>
      <description>I think your best options are a FTb , or a FT ( between this two models, i ll chose FTb, as it has a betteer meter at full aperture, exposure information on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD Camera Body with Mechanical Bulb Setting?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 18:37:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GregC</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60389</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60389</guid>
      <description>... FYI The T-70 and T-90 bodies certainly require batteries, but they do not draw any extra power during long exposures.  (A permanent magnet holds the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digest Number 4750</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Christopher Holden</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60388</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60388</guid>
      <description>OH YEAH..... it&#39;s one of those orbiting jellyfish (or something). Or not. Chris</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lens Flare</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>stoli_photo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60387</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60387</guid>
      <description>Talk about lens flare..... http://news.discovery.com/space/aurora-mystery-solved.html Vladimir Group Moderator</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Test2</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:55:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Engel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60386</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60386</guid>
      <description>Please ignore! Testing. I&#39;m not receiving my e-mail</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Test</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:35:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Engel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60385</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60385</guid>
      <description>Checking e-mail, not sure this is working</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD 85-300mm 4.5 SSC</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:24:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60384</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60384</guid>
      <description>It&#39;s a good lens.  I had one of the BL variety for several years. The VF is slightly darker because it is a 4.5 lens.  The threads in the front are for a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>FD 85-300mm 4.5 SSC</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Engel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60383</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60383</guid>
      <description>Does anyone have input on the subject lens? I picked this lens up at a pawn shop for a deal, older style with sliver ring. Questions: 1)      Image through the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT Dennis Stock</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric Goldstein</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60382</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60382</guid>
      <description>Dennis was a great, great shooter. I love the tone of his images... and I don&#39;t mean just the gray scale... Eric Goldstein</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD lenses</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Eric S Fraga</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60381</guid>
      <description>At Sat, 16 Jan 2010 11:04:04 -0000, ... I beg to differ.  This may true with some lenses but others work very well indeed wide open.  For instance, the lowly</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: OT Dennis Stock</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ed Lutz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60380</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60380</guid>
      <description>Thanks for posting this Eric. Sad, I always liked Stock&#39;s work.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FD lenses</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:05:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Machinists Mate to my Admiral</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60379</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/CanonFD/message/60379</guid>
      <description>I have never seen a formula before about the whole debate on full frame lenses on reduced sensors.  Thanks Jodie!  I came to the conclusion about a year ago</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Feb 10 06:16:48 PST 2010 -->
