<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CataNetwork-Readers at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/</link>
    <description>CataNetwork-Readers</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:09:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Donna Alward</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27759</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27759</guid>
      <description>Deborah - I can&#39;t make any particular comment about this except one clarification. Harlequin did not buy out Author&#39;s House. They entered into an agreement</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deborah Macgillivray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27758</guid>
      <description>http://pubrants.blogspot.com/2009/11/harlequin-news-flash.html Updated &lt;http://pubrants.blogspot.com/2009/11/harlequin-news-flash.html&gt; info ... From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:31:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deborah Macgillivray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27757</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27757</guid>
      <description>Harlequin just bought out Author&#39;s House, a vanity press and have put out they will now begin publishing Romance books if you pay them $600-1000 per book under</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>CeliaJade</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27756</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27756</guid>
      <description>Would you have any idea why?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lex Valentine</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27755</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27755</guid>
      <description>Exactly, Deborah! A lot of naïve authors and wannabe authors are gonna end up there because they are desperate to say they are a Harlequin authors. It&#39;s a bad</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deborah Macgillivray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27754</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27754</guid>
      <description>I am concerned all slush pile will go there.  What better way to cut down on slush pile expenses, and have slush pile actually paying money.  Instead of an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:24:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>raeblackman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27753</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27753</guid>
      <description>Harlequin don&#39;t really need the RWA. The vanity/subsidy press looks like something that was forced on them by the bosses at Torstar. Harlequin is the only</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deborah Macgillivray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27752</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27752</guid>
      <description>Well, is HQ thumbing their nose are RWA??? Inquiring minds want to know. Deborah From: CataNetwork-Readers@yahoogroups.com </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lynne Connolly</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27751</guid>
      <description>... How about HQN no longer an eligible publisher with the RWA? -- *Lynne Connolly, author of Dark and Provocative Romance Sometimes reality is better than</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:43:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice Anderson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27750</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27750</guid>
      <description>Yes, the article at CataRomance mentions that.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Deborah Macgillivray</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27749</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27749</guid>
      <description>RWA just moved to make Harlequin a &quot;non-eligible&quot; publisher. Deborah ... From: CataNetwork-Readers@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CataNetwork-Readers@yahoogroups.com]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New on CataRomance: Big Changes at Harlequin</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alice Anderson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27748</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27748</guid>
      <description>Digital Only &amp; Self/Vanity Press join the Harlequin Family. Your thoughts? http://cataurl.com/HJCjW</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Giveaways going on now</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pamela Thibodeaux</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27747</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27747</guid>
      <description>I have posted about your new site on my blog http://pamswildroseblog.blogspot.com ~Blessings~ Pamela S. Thibodeaux &quot;Inspirational with an Edge!&quot; (TM) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wednesday&#39;s Words</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:40:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27746</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27746</guid>
      <description>To get the shot, or not to get the shot: that is the question. The Canadian government is providing to all who want it, free of charge, the vaccine for the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DT: Quirky Characters</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:37:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Michelle Lauren</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27745</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CataNetwork-Readers/message/27745</guid>
      <description>Monk season 1 was hilarious. His quirks weren&#39;t just for the sake of it. They were comedic relief, sometimes they helped him stumble upon the answer to a case,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Dec 19 16:18:06 PST 2009 -->
