http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/ ClearSilver Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:14:22 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1347 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1347 I finally finished piecing together the multiple repositories, removing some internal only things, and importing the whole shebang into a public svn Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:37:39 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1346 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1346 Yes, its a known problem, I have it fixed in development but I've been swamped before I got it out the door. I'll work on it today. Brandon Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:00:24 GMT Raphaël HUCK http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1345 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1345 Le Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:18:03 -0800, ... Hi Mark, I have submitted some patches 11 months ago to OpenWrt: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/4265 and then found out Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:19:06 GMT Mark Fletcher http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1344 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1344 Not sure when this started happening, but at least with Dojo these days, forms are POSTed with a Content-Type that include a charset declaration, ie: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:15:21 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1343 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1343 ... I hadn't planned on it, no. It probably wouldn't be that hard. ... Yes, its was a mistake to make wrapper global. Changing it is somewhat troublesome, as Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:10:34 GMT vincent.godey http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1342 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1342 Hello, ClearSilver doesn't seem to be compatible with HTTP 1.1 persistent connections because it don't add Content-Length in the HTTP header of the response. Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:37:09 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1341 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1341 There is no way for the template to read the file. Code has to generate the HDF before its handed to the CS to render. Somewhere in the trac source code, there Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:25:56 GMT Tobi Lehman http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1340 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1340 I would do that, but the problem is that the cs template doesn't have any hdf dataset. I am looking for a way to wire up the template to a dataset, and so far Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:50:56 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1339 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1339 ... I know nothing of the internals to trac, but what you should be looking for is how the HDF dataset for clearsilver gets populated, since that's what you Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:01:34 GMT Tobi http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1338 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1338 I've been modifying a trac module, and it uses the ClearSilver template language. I need to get a list of strings to the template to load into a select Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:46:51 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1337 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1337 ... Sure, though the post may contain a query value which isn't a safe hdf name... slightly more likely than a varname which isn't valid, but I guess you can Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:32:34 GMT Nikolai Kondrashov http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1336 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1336 ... Sure, the patch didn't mean to change that. The purpose was to remove an obscure corner-case, to make it more straight-forward and usable. Since HDF Wed, 16 Sep 2009 04:17:51 GMT Brandon Long http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1335 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1335 Ah, in this case, since there was no other node, I can see this. I don't know what do do if you have: node.child1 = a node.child2 = b node.child3 = c node = d Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:18:24 GMT Nikolai Kondrashov http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1334 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1334 Hello everybody, Brandon Once again, I have noticed a somewhat incorrect processing of multi-value query parameters. Only this time I decided to fix and report Mon, 07 Sep 2009 16:25:19 GMT Nikolai Kondrashov http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1333 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ClearSilver/message/1333 Hi everybody, Brandon, I was dissatisfied with the value existence check operator ('?'), since most of the time I need *node* existence check, instead. So I