Corporate_Sustainability_Management at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Announcing My Move to Deloitte Consulting

Joe Firestone — Sun, 24 May 2009 02:00:33 GMT

Mark, Just wanted to make sure it wasn't a typo. Again, my best wishes for a great success, Joe ... From: "Mark W. McElroy" To:

Re: Announcing My Move to Deloitte Consulting

Steve Cavaleri — Sun, 24 May 2009 01:51:26 GMT

Hi Mark, Congratulations on being appointed to the new position at Deloitte Consulting. I'm sure you must feel gratified to find a position that offers the

Re: Announcing My Move to Deloitte Consulting

Mark W. McElroy — Sat, 23 May 2009 23:50:48 GMT

Dear Joe: The "a" signifies that there is another "mmcelroy" at Deloitte, and in order to distinguish me form him/her, the second letter of my first name has

Re: Announcing My Move to Deloitte Consulting

Joe Firestone — Sat, 23 May 2009 23:38:25 GMT

Hi Mark, Congratulations on coming to agreement with Deloitte and on your new position. I hope it meets all your hopes for it. BTW, the e-mail address below

Announcing My Move to Deloitte Consulting

Mark W. McElroy — Sat, 23 May 2009 23:25:34 GMT

Dear Friends and Colleagues: I?m writing to let you know that I have decided to accept an offer to join the Enterprise Sustainability consulting practice at

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

Mark W. McElroy — Mon, 04 May 2009 20:27:45 GMT

All: After going back and forth on this topic with Chris for several days now, with bits and pieces dribbling out on the approach I propose for computing the

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

Mark W. McElroy — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:31:11 GMT

Chris: While the bottom line term has always been nothing more than a metaphor on the non-financial side of things as far as I'm considered, I actually do

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

ethicsblogger — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:57:43 GMT

Mark: As a method for SEAAR, this makes perfectly good sense. Your use of the term "bottom line" matches up nicely with the colloquial use of that term. You

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

Mark W. McElroy — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:35:14 GMT

Chris: I think the point I'm trying to make about intercomparability is that every company's sustainability performance is a function of (a) who its

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

ethicsblogger — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:51:02 GMT

Mark: For the sake of this discussion, I'm going to give up on intercomparability of results. As long as you're ONLY trying to help a single company track its

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

Mark W. McElroy — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:27:10 GMT

Chris: Great questions, thanks. Some quick answers: 1. Sources for norms and duties are varied, depending on the metric. In some cases, they're regulatory

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

ethicsblogger — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:42:46 GMT

Mark: That's a lot to chew on. I won't try to reply to it all. Where do we get the "norms or duties for what such impacts ought to be"? Is there (or is there

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

Mark W. McElroy — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:05:13 GMT

Chris: Actually, yes, there are a few key pieces missing from the discussion that I really should explain. In particular, the 'adding up of goods and

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

ethicsblogger — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:02:16 GMT

Mark: Sounds like you're suggesting a (reasonably) method of SEAAR. And, as we tried to make clear in our paper, we're not against SEAAR. We're just against

Re: Triple Bottom Line Methods - Meaningful or Not?

Mark W. McElroy — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:27:37 GMT

All: Upon further reflection of Chris's point about giving different indicators different weights because of their arguably different importance, I find myself