Cosmology_and_Astrophysics at Yahoo! Groups

Spacetime(s) Heirarchy

rybo6 — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:51:01 GMT

... H,mm lets see if there any possible heirarchy here from above page; 01) Multiverse( multiple if not infinite number(?) of local universes ) { 3+1

Re: Time Travel

docdeal — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:08:22 GMT

Hello Leon, Just a welcome to group. Since you have extensively read materials available on time travel I doubt if I can add much to your knowledge. I really

Re: quantum

docdeal — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:08:36 GMT

John, one clarification. i intended to include most of the author/physicists of a theoretical nature, not anyone in particular as reread of my previous post

Re: quantum

docdeal — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:57:23 GMT

john i had a too cynical reply about author/physicist. but i checked myself and canceled it. inasmuch as a fundamental nature of the Universe most days tend to

Re: Time Travel

George Ducas — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:41:44 GMT

... From: Darren Subject: [Cosmology_and_Astrophysics] Time Travel To: Cosmology_and_Astrophysics@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday,

Time Travel

Darren — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:52:23 GMT

Hi everyone, I am new here, I am ery intersted in this sort of stuff since reading Visions of the Future. I have read everything I can on the theoretical

Re: quantum

john heath — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:10:58 GMT

Hi Jim Did some home work on up down electrons . If you thought I was dodging the bullet with the stuff about why and truth you would be correct . I needed to

Re: quantum virtual particles

john heath — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:40:21 GMT

Hi Rybo The electron has a charge of - 1 as well as his Friends the muon and the tauon . There could be another one between the muon and the tauon which would

Re: quantum

john heath — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:52:39 GMT

Hi David As electron inertia goes down in a superconductor photon inertia goes up . Not sure why electron and photon inertia would teeter todder like this ?

Re: quantum virtual particles

rybo6 — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:31:52 GMT

... + plus or minus -. ... John, I first looked into this some yrs ago, after hearing R. Feynman ask why does the repeat itself at exactly 206 times its mass?

Re: quantum

john heath — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:40:41 GMT

Hi David and Jim You are not butting in . Your input is always welcome . I could summarize Einstein as why and Heisenberg as truth . One could write a hologram

Re: variation in speed of light

docdeal — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:18:39 GMT

Hi Mohan, I searched high & low for such a free download of Cohen's work. Tried several search engines and such without any success. May I ask if someone

Re: Universe & Superconductor similarities

docdeal — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:15:06 GMT

Hi Jim again, By no means is my expertise in superconductors. In fact it is likely the one area of physics and materials science I am least familiar with. I

Re: quantum

docdeal — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:40:52 GMT

John, Since you brought Frank Wilczek into the aether mix I thought I check him out. Well just as I suspected and you alluded to he simply replace all ether

Re: variation in speed of light

Mohan — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:21:40 GMT