<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CreationTalk at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/</link>
    <description>Creationist-only Discussion List</description>

    <item>
      <title>Creationism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:29:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10184</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10184</guid>
      <description>While still seeking support for my proposed creation science museum, I have started developing the exhibits for the on line version. I am starting out with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Organic Evolution &amp; Micro Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10183</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10183</guid>
      <description>Technically he&#39;s right; the origin of life is referred to as chemical evolution. However they are both part of General Evolution.  I hope this helps. ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Organic Evolution &amp; Micro Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10182</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10182</guid>
      <description>I was discussing organic evolution as the belief in origin of life with an evoltuionist. He informed me that organic evolution has nothing to do with the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:50:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Baker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10181</guid>
      <description>Your responce about Hell reminded my of a sign my daughter saw in Idaho. &quot;Stop, drop and roll will not work in Hell!&quot; A local Chistian group is putting up</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:46:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10180</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10180</guid>
      <description>Sorry about that. I stand corrected.  Though it does apply to Evolutionists however. ... Genesis Science &lt;http://gscim.com/&gt;  Museum _____ From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chris Ashcraft</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10179</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10179</guid>
      <description>... Darwin&#39;s Dilemma is produced by Illustra Media, the same company that is responsible for Unlocking the Mystery of Life, and The Privileged Planet. We</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>steelville</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10178</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10178</guid>
      <description>That&#39;s right Chuck, they would deny evidence right in front of themselves. Dawkins would say Crusaders are zapping him with crazy rays. Not for nothing Abraham</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Derek Yesucevitz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10177</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10177</guid>
      <description>Hi all, I would suggest a great book by the late Dr. Greg Bahnsen, &quot;Always Ready&quot;, the presuppositional approach to apologetics. All I will say now, it will</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:37:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10176</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10176</guid>
      <description>Of course they did not mention God, they have a prior commitment to absolute naturalism. It reminds me of the story about an atheist that demanded of God,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Darwin&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:56:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Baker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10175</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10175</guid>
      <description>Just got this DVD this weekend.  They did a very fine job of showing how impossible Darwin&#39;s Theory is. And as always, not a single word about GOD. Lowell </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microbial Habitability index - Correction</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:24:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10174</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10174</guid>
      <description>Exactly! you can&#39;t base a model on the fringes of the data set, it&#39;s bad science. In terms of messaging habitability, you have to use the norm as your base</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microbial Habitability index - Correction</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:35:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James E</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10173</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10173</guid>
      <description>Of course, the evolutionists have eaten their own words again. Also, I want to make sure that everyone knows all the planets in the universe have intelligent</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microbial Habitability index - Correction</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:35:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Temlakos</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10172</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10172</guid>
      <description>In sum, those who invented this index are using extremophiles (microbes that can stand the extreme heat or cold) to equate the hospitability of Earth and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microbial Habitability index - Correction</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:36:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10171</guid>
      <description>From: CreationTalk@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CreationTalk@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Hiscock Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 9:47 PM To:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microbial Habitability index</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Hiscock</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10170</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CreationTalk/message/10170</guid>
      <description>Perhaps they have a bunch of strange parameters - rather than common sense.. Saying that earth is only 40% habitable, when in reality 99% of the earth is</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec  3 17:33:09 PST 2009 -->
