CriticalChain at Yahoo! Groups

telephone hell

Anthony Rizzo — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:13:32 GMT

I think that my telephone-hell is over, finally. Please note TWO new numbers, if you're interested. FYI, Verizon led me to believe that two lines would be

Re: Sixes

Lawrence — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:16:53 GMT

Hi, Brian Thanks for some helpful thoughts. Yes, the place to start is with the lightbulbs we want to go off. One difficulty is that the associations people

Re: New member presentation

sunil — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:47:32 GMT

Hello, I am also a CCPM professional. Can we have a common place where we can share resources of CCPM? I am willing to manage the common place on Public Domain

New member presentation

Alonso Soler — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:26:34 GMT

Hello fellows interested in CCPM around the world. I'm involved with the topic and have some experiences aplllying CCPM in Brazil. I'm glad to share

New member presentation

Alonso Soler — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:26:27 GMT

Hello fellows interested in CCPM around the world. I'm involved with the topic and have some experiences aplllying CCPM in Brazil. I'm glad to share

Sixes

Potter, James Brian — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:36:14 GMT

Larry, Consider some network other than N tasks in series. Introduce a little parallelism. Maybe something (best viewed in a monospaced font like Courier) like

Re: Fwd: [CriticalChain] Sixes

Lawrence — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:20:03 GMT

Hi, James The problem I have is that statistical theory says we should use the mean, not the median. Only means add linearly. As I noted to Jay, it is actually

Re: Sixes

Lawrence — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:11:58 GMT

Hi, Jay It is actually a geometric distribution. You can check out the theoretical on Wikipedia. The exponential is a smooth approximation to it, I suppose.

Fwd: [CriticalChain] Sixes

Santiago Velásquez Martínez — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:10:13 GMT

Dr. Holts comments....... ... From: Holt, James R Date: 2009/6/30 Subject: RE: [CriticalChain] Sixes To: Santiago Velásquez Martínez

Re: Sixes

jblists — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:08:48 GMT

Larry, I did a little playing in Excel and realized that the distribution of the number of rolls is an exponential with a lambda of 1/6. This yields a median

Re: Sixes

Jack Dahlgren — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:59:45 GMT

... Winning the lottery is low probability, but it seems to be done all the time. The beauty of chance is that there is a chance. In this case you were lower

Sixes

Lawrence — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:54:16 GMT

Hi, Jay Did the Sixes game today with a dozen participants. It was OK, but did not go as I expected. Most did not get very high runs, altough we did 60 total.

Re: A little statistical help

Lawrence — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:57:21 GMT

Hi, Jay Thanks. It is interesting that it came to the same number for this case. You need a buffer sizing approach that works generally; i.e. with different

Re: A little statistical help

Lawrence — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:52:33 GMT

Hi, Jay Interesting. I am going to do it Monday, and try 20. Alas, there are too many variables for it to be a direct comparision. Larry

New desk-number

Anthony Rizzo — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:44:07 GMT

FYI Tony Rizzo +1 908 322 1840 <-------------- new desk-number! If you care, please update your address-book. +1 908 230 5348 mobile