<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CriticalChain at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/</link>
    <description>Critical Chain Project Management, Program Management, TOC and Projects</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Rumination 1</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:37:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Nicos Leon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10735</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10735</guid>
      <description>Larry, Very good topic for discussion. When I hear that question, I always make the analogy with some category of patients (fortunately only a few think like</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:07:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Crispin (&quot;Kik&quot;) Piney</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10734</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10734</guid>
      <description>Larry I realize that the idea of an availability parameter could be used as a basis for multitasking, but that was not my intention. In my scenario, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eli&#39;s new book</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:33:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Clarke Ching</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10733</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10733</guid>
      <description>Just in case you hadn&#39;t noticed ....Eli Goldratt&#39;s new business novel &quot;Isn&#39;t It Obvious&quot; is very nearly out. It&#39;s an excellent book, this time looking at the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jblists</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10732</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10732</guid>
      <description>Larry, The best way I know how is to add yet a third class of task: the lower priority project task. The process is roughly to assign people to projects taking</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruminations 2</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:22:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Potter, James Brian</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10731</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10731</guid>
      <description>Larry, We both know that (except in movies, scary novels, and the _Lone Ranger_) there are no silver bullets. As long as top executives are satisfied with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:43:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lawrence_leach</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10730</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10730</guid>
      <description>Hi, Jack You clearly understand the situation. Yes, one can reduce the available resource for projects by either sequestering them; i.e. leave them out of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lawrence_leach</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10729</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10729</guid>
      <description>Hi, Tony Full agreement. I am still looking for how to prioritize the non-project work tasks amongst the project work tasks. Regards, Larry</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruminations 2</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:28:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lawrence_leach</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10728</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10728</guid>
      <description>Hi, Brian Yes; wish I could find the silver bullets. Regards, Larry</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lawrence_leach</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10727</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10727</guid>
      <description>Hi, Kik Planned multitasking? Not on my watch! Regards, Larry</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jack Vinson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10726</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10726</guid>
      <description>All- For what it&#39;s worth, non-project-work of this variety shows up in more than engineering environments.  I particularly like the way Larry described it: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Rizzo</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10725</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10725</guid>
      <description>Hello Larry, If an effective resource-control function is in place, I prefer the use of capacity-buffers, enough to account for most of the non-project work. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steven Kass</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10724</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10724</guid>
      <description>Hi Tony, I have not seen the question asked this specifically. What was asked was how to priroritize the tasks in general. Though some of the answers actually</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:12:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Crispin (&quot;Kik&quot;) Piney</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10723</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10723</guid>
      <description>&quot;These are Engineering organizations that support both capital projects and maintenance engineering&quot; One standard mitigation approach in such organizations is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ruminations 2</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Potter, James Brian</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10722</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10722</guid>
      <description>Larry, This may be part of what some of my acquaintances and I (among ourselves) sometimes call &quot;Big Company Disease.&quot; It essentially refers to circumstances</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Non Project Work</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lawrence_leach</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10721</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalChain/message/10721</guid>
      <description>Hi, Tony I recognized one of the respondents (Oliver). He is aware of multiporject CCPM, although his answer wouldn&#39;t let you know that. The others were</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 10 04:24:28 PST 2009 -->
