<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CriticalRationalism at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/</link>
    <description>Critical Rationalism</description>

    <item>
      <title>Herakleitos and Diogenes</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Elliot Temple</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13508</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13508</guid>
      <description>http://curi.us/1457-herakleitos-and-diogenes I typed in a bunch of presocratic fragments of interest. Some are fallibilist. There is some similar material in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intellectual or active interest?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13507</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13507</guid>
      <description>... JE:- Intellectual interest represents an &quot;active&quot; interest because in a civilized society we must think before we act. My understanding of the history of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intellectual or active interest?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:20:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Elliot Temple</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13506</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13506</guid>
      <description>... I would like to put it into practice and have real input. I&#39;m not sure how that differs from raising awareness. The way one gets political ideas practiced</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Intellectual or active interest?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Aaron Agassi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13505</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13505</guid>
      <description>A question to each participant in this group: Is the matter of fallible human beings in the open society together crafting lasting social institutions in order</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Formal debate concerning evolutionary theory and falsifiability on D</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:49:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13504</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13504</guid>
      <description>For those interested, I will be formally debating Mr Simon Gunkel on the Dawkins Net debating forum on the following question: &quot;While Darwinism stands proudly</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:47:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>THRASSOS</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13503</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13503</guid>
      <description>... Dear Elliot, What if Neo Darwinianism which from a certain point of view is divided to a left wing and a liberal fraction was contemplated a single</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bill Bartley</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13502</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13502</guid>
      <description>A nice biographical sketch has been put on the Bartley website. http://www.bartleyinstitute.org/node/6 You can also find a fragment of Popper biography, the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Rulifson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13501</guid>
      <description>Elliot: Thank you. This is much more clear than Wikipedia on Neo-darwinism. Jeff http://jeff.rulifson.name &#43;1 (650) 924-2758</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13500</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13500</guid>
      <description>... JE:- Hi Elliot, Dawkins is the University Of Oxfords official communicator for the Neo Darwinian model (not the Darwinian Theory which he misrepresents as </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dawkins Paradox</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13499</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13499</guid>
      <description>WNYC Radio Lab Podcast  &quot;In Defense Of Darwinism? (available as a free podcast on Itunes) Dawkins opened: &quot;As an academic scientist I am a passionate Darwinian</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Elliot Temple</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13498</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13498</guid>
      <description>... Nah. You&#39;re mixing up neo-darwinists with atheists (as Dawkins also does). When Dawkins goes on TV to argue with O&#39;Reilly, he&#39;s not a serious</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:35:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13497</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13497</guid>
      <description>... Okay, but this would move the argument away from the idea and towards those advocating it. That is, this suggest people are either immoral *or* that the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13496</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13496</guid>
      <description>&quot;Presumably the people involved didn&#39;t know that it wouldn&#39;t work until they tried to make it fly. Also, it strikes me that Popper&#39;s &#39;Logic of Scientific</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13495</guid>
      <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECE77Imki9M&amp;feature=topvideos Dawkins continues to make millions out of the silliest show on earth.. Note that the key word</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:48:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13494</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13494</guid>
      <description>... I can&#39;t off the top of my head think of any reason for disagreeing with this. ... I&#39;m not sure about the second part of this answer, just speculating,</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Dec 21 06:51:13 PST 2009 -->
