<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CriticalRationalism at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/</link>
    <description>Critical Rationalism</description>

    <item>
      <title>Bill Bartley</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:18:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13502</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13502</guid>
      <description>A nice biographical sketch has been put on the Bartley website. http://www.bartleyinstitute.org/node/6 You can also find a fragment of Popper biography, the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Rulifson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13501</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13501</guid>
      <description>Elliot: Thank you. This is much more clear than Wikipedia on Neo-darwinism. Jeff http://jeff.rulifson.name &#43;1 (650) 924-2758</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13500</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13500</guid>
      <description>... JE:- Hi Elliot, Dawkins is the University Of Oxfords official communicator for the Neo Darwinian model (not the Darwinian Theory which he misrepresents as </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dawkins Paradox</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:21:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13499</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13499</guid>
      <description>WNYC Radio Lab Podcast  &quot;In Defense Of Darwinism? (available as a free podcast on Itunes) Dawkins opened: &quot;As an academic scientist I am a passionate Darwinian</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:02:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Elliot Temple</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13498</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13498</guid>
      <description>... Nah. You&#39;re mixing up neo-darwinists with atheists (as Dawkins also does). When Dawkins goes on TV to argue with O&#39;Reilly, he&#39;s not a serious</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:35:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt Dioguardi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13497</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13497</guid>
      <description>... Okay, but this would move the argument away from the idea and towards those advocating it. That is, this suggest people are either immoral *or* that the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13496</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13496</guid>
      <description>&quot;Presumably the people involved didn&#39;t know that it wouldn&#39;t work until they tried to make it fly. Also, it strikes me that Popper&#39;s &#39;Logic of Scientific</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Silliest Show On Earth ...</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:49:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13495</guid>
      <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECE77Imki9M&amp;feature=topvideos Dawkins continues to make millions out of the silliest show on earth.. Note that the key word</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:48:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13494</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13494</guid>
      <description>... I can&#39;t off the top of my head think of any reason for disagreeing with this. ... I&#39;m not sure about the second part of this answer, just speculating,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [curi] The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan Forrester</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13493</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13493</guid>
      <description>... Presumably the people involved didn&#39;t know that it wouldn&#39;t work until they tried to make it fly. Also, it strikes me that Popper&#39;s &#39;Logic of Scientific</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The cost of positivism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:38:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rafe Champion</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13492</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13492</guid>
      <description>Toby Huff in Max Weber and the Methodology of the Social Scienes (Transaction Books, 1984) suggested that the philosophy of science that Weber was reading read</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CR Saying</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>leekelly7</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13491</guid>
      <description>This line occurred to me a couple of weeks ago, and I thought it neatly captured the CR philosophy: &quot;A criticism that can be brought against everything ought</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Health Care:  A Tale of Two Frames Of Reference</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13490</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13490</guid>
      <description>Do we want to remain well or should we allow ourselves to get sick because of increasingly poor life styles and then _unreasonably_ ask to be cured no matter</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why A  Solution To Zeno&#39;s Paradox Remains Important To Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13489</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13489</guid>
      <description>... JE:- Yes, but it doesn&#39;t. Note that this was only manifest via predictions which were here-to-for not even thought of. IOW, only the massive increase in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why A  Solution To Zeno&#39;s Paradox Remains Important To Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:09:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Edser</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13488</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CriticalRationalism/message/13488</guid>
      <description>... JE:- Aaron, No &quot;end&quot; (or even a start) can be defined using mathematics. Both have to be defined _outside_ of mathematics and subsequently imported into </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 07:42:20 PST 2009 -->
