DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Where's everbody at?

Neil Habermehl — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:54:38 GMT

Maybe they got tired of fallacious arguments of the form "scientists are sometimes unable to appeal to crowds of people lacking scientific understanding and

Re: Where's everbody at?

Laurie Appleton — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:11:23 GMT

... From: hjbluebird2002 To: DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 8:10 AM Subject: [DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM] Re: Where's everbody

Re: Where's everbody at?

hjbluebird2002 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:10:49 GMT

Hi Laurie, See below. Harry ... [Harry] Well that's nice to hear. Only the serious one should be allowed on. I'm active on the christian debate list now. I

Re: Where's everbody at?

Laurie Appleton — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:37:13 GMT

... From: hjbluebird2002 To: DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 3:09 AM Subject: [DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM] Where's everbody at?

Where's everbody at?

hjbluebird2002 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:09:31 GMT

I'm just wondering what happened everbody? Harry Jones

Intelligent Design - Unlocking The Mysteries Of Life

Kurt Streutker — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:22:07 GMT

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5585125669588896670 A thoughtful and well presented argument for a turn away from the dry/rationalist argument that

drvr2hrdwr couldn't handle the pressure

tinroad6g — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:32:29 GMT

Most evolutionists can't handle the pressure of honest discussion. The very thought of the fact that the Bible is correct terrifies them

Re: Debate---vs---discussion

tinroad6g — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:34:06 GMT

tin I will attempt to explain it again-- Your links show that the stars are old "within the time frame environment" in which they were created. The Bible

Re: Debate---vs---discussion

drvr2hrdwr — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:17:54 GMT

From: tinroad6g Debate generates the desire to "win." Neil: Maybe you are simply projecting, speak for yourself. Once that desire is generated there is no

Debate---vs---discussion

tinroad6g — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:59:40 GMT

Debate generates the desire to "win." Once that desire is generated there is no reason to continue. Evolutionists constantly desire to debate creationists. In

It appears that drvr2hrdwr is unwillingly to examine his beliefs

tinroad6g — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:05:59 GMT

It appears that "drvr2hrdwr" is unwilling to put his beliefs to the test of science and Einstein's works. This is not unusual. Most old Earth believers are

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Sun, 31 May 2009 21:03:51 GMT

tin Correct--the theory of the big bang by atheists is not statistically improbable but impossible. Math doesn't lie MARK I HAVE A COMMENT ON THE BIG BANG.

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

Mark Goldsmith — Sun, 31 May 2009 04:42:04 GMT

I HAVE A COMMENT ON THE BIG BANG. GOD SPOKE AND "BANG" IT HAPPENED. ________________________________ From: drvr2hrdwr To:

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Sun, 31 May 2009 01:43:12 GMT

tin If mass increases the speed of events maintains a relationship within that time frame environment but slows down. Mass increasing from zero to its present

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Wed, 27 May 2009 14:42:23 GMT

tin We are still waiting I want to see those thousands of detailed models.