DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM at Yahoo! Groups

Intelligent Design - Unlocking The Mysteries Of Life

Kurt Streutker — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:22:07 GMT

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5585125669588896670 A thoughtful and well presented argument for a turn away from the dry/rationalist argument that

drvr2hrdwr couldn't handle the pressure

tinroad6g — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:32:29 GMT

Most evolutionists can't handle the pressure of honest discussion. The very thought of the fact that the Bible is correct terrifies them

Re: Debate---vs---discussion

tinroad6g — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:34:06 GMT

tin I will attempt to explain it again-- Your links show that the stars are old "within the time frame environment" in which they were created. The Bible

Re: Debate---vs---discussion

drvr2hrdwr — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:17:54 GMT

From: tinroad6g Debate generates the desire to "win." Neil: Maybe you are simply projecting, speak for yourself. Once that desire is generated there is no

Debate---vs---discussion

tinroad6g — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 18:59:40 GMT

Debate generates the desire to "win." Once that desire is generated there is no reason to continue. Evolutionists constantly desire to debate creationists. In

It appears that drvr2hrdwr is unwillingly to examine his beliefs

tinroad6g — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 06:05:59 GMT

It appears that "drvr2hrdwr" is unwilling to put his beliefs to the test of science and Einstein's works. This is not unusual. Most old Earth believers are

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Sun, 31 May 2009 21:03:51 GMT

tin Correct--the theory of the big bang by atheists is not statistically improbable but impossible. Math doesn't lie MARK I HAVE A COMMENT ON THE BIG BANG.

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

Mark Goldsmith — Sun, 31 May 2009 04:42:04 GMT

I HAVE A COMMENT ON THE BIG BANG. GOD SPOKE AND "BANG" IT HAPPENED. ________________________________ From: drvr2hrdwr To:

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Sun, 31 May 2009 01:43:12 GMT

tin If mass increases the speed of events maintains a relationship within that time frame environment but slows down. Mass increasing from zero to its present

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Wed, 27 May 2009 14:42:23 GMT

tin We are still waiting I want to see those thousands of detailed models.

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Mon, 25 May 2009 21:01:39 GMT

tin If you can do all those things--have at it-stop talking and get to it. Einstein's work is no longer a theory nor a secret. There is plenty of information

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Mon, 18 May 2009 10:44:18 GMT

tin Einstein's special theory of relativity on time is no longer a theory Laurie. It has been proven. Evolutionists who wish to deny that fact and not study

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

Laurie Appleton — Mon, 18 May 2009 06:41:29 GMT

... From: drvr2hrdwr To: DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:11 AM Subject: [DEBUNKINGEVOLUTIONISM] Re: How we see the light

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Sun, 17 May 2009 20:56:27 GMT

tin The point of the fact is that your first post demonstrated that you are rude and lack manners. This shows that you are ignorant. I couldn't care less about

Re: How we see the light from SN1987-A

tinroad6g — Sun, 17 May 2009 16:00:23 GMT

tin you don't deserve an answer due to being ignorant, rude and lacking common manners. Who cares what you think. You are an excellent example of an