DNA-Testing at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

m. l. limbert — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:09:40 GMT

OK, thank you very much. Got it now. Mary Lyn www.bonanzle.com/booths/tinyarmadillos Check out my new creations

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Bob May — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:50:51 GMT

yes ... From: m. l. limbert To: DNA-Testing@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:43 PM Subject: RE: [DNA-Testing] Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

m. l. limbert — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:43:55 GMT

So you’re actually “forgetting” someone or everyone ELSE’s results of a particular kind and not your own??? Mary Lyn

news articles

Bob May — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:49:00 GMT

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/178340.php Protein That Splices And Dices Genes Identified By Scientists

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Bob May — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:54:14 GMT

when comparing your resultd with another any matches that have those results are of no genealogical interest to you. bob ... From: m. l. limbert To:

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

m. l. limbert — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:57:11 GMT

Here’s a dumb question on the chart. Why would you want to “forget” any results? Mary Lyn

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Bob May — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:43:07 GMT

Without being rude Susan but did you read the chart? it works on a block of 6 rows eg's to right row 1 how many markers were tested 12

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Susan Rosine — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:01:58 GMT

Arvina, You need to be aware that with FTDNA, sometimes the green confirmed just means the person had a "backbone" test done (which is free, when FTDNA doesn't

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Susan Rosine — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:54:24 GMT

What does this chart mean? I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me, or what! Susan ... From: Bob May Subject: Re:

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Susan Rosine — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:52:42 GMT

John, I suppose it depends on the haplogroup. My understanding was that FTDNA's predictions had an overall accuracy of 90%+, but it may be harder to predict

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

basenji_luvr@... — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:44:43 GMT

I realize you are asking John, so feel free to ignore me again. First, whoever is running your project is just plain doing it wrong. Just because you match

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

Arvina Copeland — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:24:24 GMT

John, Our project is divided into groups. Each group will match 11/12 or 12/12 of the first panel tested by Family Tree. The other 55 markers are not taken

Re: TESTS TO DO

Nena Smothers — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:49:57 GMT

I'VE RUN OUR PATERNAL DNA PROJECT SINCE 2002 AND I AM NOT YELLING [HAD CATARACT SURGERY SO THINGS STILL BIT OUT OF FOCUS FOR ME YET] ANY WAY NO ONE SEEMS TO BE

Re: Mtdna testing by Family Tree

John Lloyd Scharf — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:25:24 GMT

It is difficult to find a surname from testing because the database is still far from being adequate for that purpose. However, if it is to be done, it has to

Re: Haplogroup Clarification

John Lloyd Scharf — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:24:42 GMT

Haplogroups can only serve to eliminate the possibility of relationship if you are refering to the time in which surnames have existed. Again, the 12 cose are