<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DOpus at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/</link>
    <description>Directory Opus Announcement List</description>

    <item>
      <title>DOpus Minor Update 9.0.0.9 now available</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7353</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7353</guid>
      <description>A minor update for Directory Opus is now available for download (http://www.gpsoft.com.au/DScripts/Download.asp) from the GP Software website. Changes in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Directory Opus 9.0.0.8 very minor update now available</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:33:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7352</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7352</guid>
      <description>Thanks to those who reported some small issues overnight with the 9008 version. We have made a very minor change to this and updated the download files. If you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Directory Opus 9.0.0.8 update now available</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:34:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7351</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7351</guid>
      <description>An  update for Directory Opus is now available for download from the GP Software website (http://www.gpsoft.com.au/DScripts/Download.asp). Version 9.0.0.8 -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Directory Opus 9 is here!!!</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7350</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7350</guid>
      <description>As posted in the DOpus Resource Centre (http://resource.dopus.com/index.php): Dear Directory Opus Users, GP Software are pleased to announce that Directory</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: As we end an era... and begin a new one!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 21:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7349</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7349</guid>
      <description>Hello Hans, On Sunday, February 4, 2007, at 3:02:10 PM, you wrote ... A big thank you! That means a lot - especially coming from one of our biggest</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: As we end an era... and begin a new one!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 20:07:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>shtik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7348</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7348</guid>
      <description>Dear Wayne: A heartfelt thanks from one very satisfied list member.  You have done a terrific job. Hans L On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:05:45 -0000</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As we end an era... and begin a new one!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 18:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7347</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7347</guid>
      <description>Dear fellow group members: As described in my message written to our group Friday, I will be putting this group into announce-only mode at the end of today. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>shtik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7346</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7346</guid>
      <description>Leo, I appreciate that you are defending Steve, as he is (I am sure) a friend of yours.  But the truth is that he has a really bad attitude, and you can, as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:16:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7345</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7345</guid>
      <description>Hello Daron, On Saturday, February 3, 2007, at 1:06:27 PM, you wrote ... Worry not. I&#39;m not doing that. -- Cheers! Wayne Howard Moderator Using The Bat!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daron Brewood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7344</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7344</guid>
      <description>[quote]No, because every message would be from the same user and I am certain that it violates rules by Yahoo.[/quote] It can actually be done, as M2F was</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 17:21:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Wayne Howard</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7343</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7343</guid>
      <description>Hello UnspecifiedId, On Saturday, February 3, 2007, at 1:52:10 AM, you wrote ... No, because every message would be from the same user and I am certain that it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:56:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Leo Davidson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7342</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7342</guid>
      <description>Hans, Peter, FFS, you&#39;re reading into things that simply aren&#39;t there. IF STEVE DIDN&#39;T WANT PEOPLE TO USE M2F HE WOULD NOT HAVE INSTALLED IT IN THE FIRST</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>UnspecifiedId</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7341</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7341</guid>
      <description>Wouldn&#39;t it just be easier to have M2F send to the dopus@yahoogroups.com ? That way both parties have what they want. Saying that I&#39;m sort of with Leo in his</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>stevebanham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7340</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7340</guid>
      <description>... not ... robots? Steve ... us, but why ... those of us ... Now I AM getting angry. Does not give a damn? For christs sake pal I spent a LOT of time setting</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Important message regarding this group</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>shtik</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7339</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DOpus/message/7339</guid>
      <description>Steve, decision are always weighed in favor of the majority.  That is universal, and acceptable, of course.   But you have, as you said, taken the view of the </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Nov 23 07:45:01 PST 2009 -->
