<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetPatterns at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/</link>
    <description>.NET Design Patterns discussion</description>

    <item>
      <title>Password protect</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:07:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wexlar1</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/45</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/45</guid>
      <description>How do I set up my page to prompt a user name and password login at the home page? I am writing in asp.net and need some help. I need to authenticate as much</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Typical N-Tier</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dagda1970</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/44</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/44</guid>
      <description>Hi all, I&#39;m just sort of curious to what architecture other people are using. I guess the architecture we use is pretty typical.  I mainly work on websites so</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Seeking Authors</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:39:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jm04469</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/43</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/43</guid>
      <description>Looking for co-authors for two upcoming books. The first book is on enterprise architecture. Must be familar with business architecture, reference models,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reviewers: Enterprise SOA</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:17:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James McGovern</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/42</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/42</guid>
      <description>Several authors are finishing up a manuscript for an upcoming book tentatively entitled: Enterprise SOA which discusses at an advanced level: Component Based</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lookup Tables</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dagda1970</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/41</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/41</guid>
      <description>All, I&#39;m looking for some guidance for the following scenario: I&#39;m building a small ASP.NET application to update reference / lookup tables.  Most of these</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lazy Load Observer pattern?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rob Waggoner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/40</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/40</guid>
      <description>Here&#39;s a note I sent out to my comrades yesterday. Thoughts and comments appreciated: 1) Core design pattern Observer (aka Publish/Subscribe) </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Persisting Objects </title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Joe Da Silva</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/39</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/39</guid>
      <description>Hi All, I&#39;ve got this application where thousands of objects are created once every so often -- they are the application metadata. They are build from a huge</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>deployment: best practices</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dagda1970</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/38</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/38</guid>
      <description>Hi all, Being quite new to .net, I am wandering what the best approach is to deployment of the following scenario: I have 1 COM+ application containing a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>COM+ Transactions</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dagda1970</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/37</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/37</guid>
      <description>All, I have a question concerning COM+ transactions from a .net point of view. The scenario is this: I have a complete class where I have set the transaction</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sharing state across application domains</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:03:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alan Flaherty</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/36</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/36</guid>
      <description>Why do you need to share the state and what types of application is it being shared between. But, you could use sql server - an xml based solution (save to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sharing state across application domains</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dagda1970</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/35</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/35</guid>
      <description>Hi all, Does anyone have any advice on sharing state amongst different class library applications? Is this possible? Thanks Paul</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Singleton problem</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 02:22:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rob Waggoner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/34</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/34</guid>
      <description>Have a look here: http://www.dofactory.com/Patterns/PatternSingleton.aspx this is the first resource I turn to when trying to implement patterns in C#. Waggs </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Singleton problem</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 02:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Greiner</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/33</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/33</guid>
      <description>http://msdn.microsoft.com/practices/type/Patterns/Enterprise/ImpSingletonInCsharp/ Or, you may prefer this instead.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Singleton problem</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2003 03:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dagda1970</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/32</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/32</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am trying to implement a singleton design pattern in a class library project and running into problems. In the class where I want only one running</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: COM Compatibility</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2003 16:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Laudeman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/31</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/DotNetPatterns/message/31</guid>
      <description>Hi Paul, There is not really a sense of traditional COM-based &quot;binary&quot; compatibility any longer with .NET ? it?s all about the public methods and</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Jan  5 16:08:57 PST 2010 -->
