ExclusivelyKabbalah at Yahoo! Groups

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Brown Rose — Thu, 01 May 2008 15:16:31 GMT

I was hoping to hear from Hoomer, but your reply came just as good. What I meant by consciousness was perception, vision, sight, inner sight - insight. One

Re: Only Breath

Jaron — Thu, 01 May 2008 03:20:06 GMT

... Nice.

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Jason Sechrest — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:45:18 GMT

I can understand what you're saying -- about leaving behind the desires of the physical world and how restriction generally helps one achieve a higher

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Isolde Manasa — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:18:54 GMT

... It does; this is a physical fact. We only have so much energy available to us; if one is REALLY REALLY determined to achieve spiritually, one must restrict

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Brown Rose — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:00:11 GMT

What if self control, in every aspects of life, helps to achieve a higher degree of consciousness? Just wondering... Brown Hoomer wrote:

Re: Only Breath

Malcolm Schosha — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:38:11 GMT

Breathe in. Breathe out. Breathe in. Breathe out. Forget this and attaining Enlightenment will be the least of your problems. (From "Zen Judaism: For You a

Only Breath

Logan — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:28:18 GMT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZqAnIp5dMQ

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Malcolm Schosha — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:21:00 GMT

I have no idea how you arrived at that conclusion from my very short explanation of tradition and custom based on values. If you (or Arthur Green) are not

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Hoomer — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:22:07 GMT

well theres the whole do not spill ever school of tantrics... you know like sting retain the erection for hours, and dont spill... part of the demon thing is

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Hoomer — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:17:57 GMT

Arthur Green in "A guide to the Zohar" argues this is mostly a product of the times. As I mentioned, many Judaic/Christian sexual norms are pnly about 1000 yrs

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Hoomer — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:12:30 GMT

good archaic stuff penises are for the vagina..... a persons entire body is a vessel, it doesn't have to be an orifice.... intent is everything women, despite

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Malcolm Schosha — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:08:23 GMT

Jason, I don't think the answer to your question is entirely in Kabbalah. In the Jewish religious tradition, which Kabbalah obviously comes from, pretty much

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Brown Rose — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:12:45 GMT

Sorry for monopolizing the discussion, but I have to correct myself again. That´s the thing about undestanding, interpretation and the words we use for that

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Brown Rose — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:41:58 GMT

I don´t think that the vital energy of exposed semen is food for the Other Side. Love for self-concerned satisfaction, on the other hand, is definetely food

Re: The Kabbalah Book of Sex: Intriguing But Flawed

Jason Sechrest — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:44:43 GMT

Thanks. I agree with most of what you're saying. I just don't think exposed semen is eaten up by the forces of negativity in necessarily every case. I think