FamilyWars at Yahoo! Groups

RE: [IndianaCRC] Digest Number 1946

Chairman — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:40:58 GMT

"Dave Anderson" dobradavid@... wrote, "How about "one or more people out there protesting EFFECTVELY" is better than one or more men out there simply

RE: Child Support Boycott

Chairman — Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:53:00 GMT

As several people have pointed out, one of the major weaknesses in a hypothetical child $upport boycott is that the government has taken away the discretionary

Re: Child Support Boycott

Chairman — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:31:20 GMT

Larry, We could never organize enough non-custodial parents to make the boycott effective. We've never been able to organize enough NCPs to do anything that

Re: Do you rememer this? ACTIVIST ALERT-US Brother Activist Jailed

Chairman — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:44:26 GMT

Larry, You made an excellent point when you wrote, "My point is we are keeping the peace and are a valued player to our adversaries." For whatever reasons, we

Re: Bill Stoneking jailed for 45 days for directly emailing a judge

Chairman — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:42:34 GMT

Mike, that is the question. Until we change the laws in each of the 50 states, as well as several Federal laws, this will continue to happen. The way to change

Re: [networkingfathers] Re: Bill Stoneking jailed for 45 days for di

Chairman — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:15:54 GMT

Misinformation is one of the great risks of people posting requests for legal help to Internet groups. Ex parte is a Latin phrase that means for, by, or in

Re: Bill Stoneking jailed for 45 days for directly emailing a judge

Chairman — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:35:20 GMT

The details do not matter, for divorce industry judges can do almost anything they want and get away with it. I saw a case here on Monday. The father has a

Bill Stoneking jailed for 45 days for directly emailing a judge

Chairman — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:57:54 GMT

I hope there is more to this than one-email to the judge. That would be an ex parte communication if Bill is not represented by an attorney. However, if he is

Re: [Parents Without Rights] Digest Number 2317

Chairman — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:12:51 GMT

Debbie Wasserman Schultz is one of the reasons that Florida's family law is misandric and anti-father. Dear Floridian Supporter, It's time to get more

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

Chairman — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:13:49 GMT

... This e-mail (including any attachments) is protected by the United States Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§2510-2521 and is

Trouble Ahead For Father's Rights: Supreme Court Says Sotomayor is W

Chairman — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:48:29 GMT

Sonia Sotomayor has a TERRIBLE record as a Circuit Court judge, of being REVERSED by the U.S. Supreme Court over and over again. In fact, OVER HALF of her

Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship-Christina Hoff Sommers (Tha

Chairman — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:03:27 GMT

<< "Harder to kill than a vampire." That is what the sociologist Joel Best calls a bad statistic. But, as I have discovered over the years, among false

July 4, 2009 - A time for assessment of the father's rights movement

Chairman — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:50:19 GMT

I have started a new blog using the free services of Google's blogger. I invite you to read it, make comments, and contribute. Thank you. This e-mail

Sac Bee Article - Father Pleads Guilty to Felony Failure to Pay Chil

Kathryn Santos-Reed — Fri, 29 May 2009 10:07:40 GMT

I don't know how some of you fathers will feel about this article which appeared in the Sacramento Bee, I imagine some of you will feel it was a case overly

Re: Child support & unemployment

Chairman — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:54:58 GMT

In Florida, Circuit Court Judges routinely and knowingly violate the law, knowing that they are unlikely to face an appeal, much less be overturned. A Circuit