<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Flexagon_Lovers at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/</link>
    <description>Flexagon Lovers</description>

    <item>
      <title>video: flexagon illusion</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/637</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/637</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve posted a new video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDN1Tbsxkec that shows one sort of illusion you can make on a flexagon.  I start out by showing how</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tuck flex added to the flexagon simulator</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/636</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/636</guid>
      <description>Well, you now support what I think of as the most basic flexes on the hexaflexagon, the pinch, v and tuck.  They each require at least 9 leaves for the minimal</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tuck flex added to the flexagon simulator</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yaacov Belenky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/635</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/635</guid>
      <description>Scott, Yes, tuck flex fits into my framework, and I believe any other flex does as well. What&#39;s the next flex that you would like me to add to the simulator? </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tuck flex added to the flexagon simulator</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:14:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/634</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/634</guid>
      <description>Yaacov, did you find a way to fit the tuck flex into your current framework of the flexagon formulas and edge weights?  Will it extend to other flexes?  As</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tetrahedral Kite</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:14:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Kathy Knapp</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/633</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/633</guid>
      <description>Looks like it could be fun to build and fly http://www.instructables.com/id/Bell-Tetrahedral-Kite/ Bell Tetrahedral Kite Alexander Graham Bell used tetrahedral</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tuck flex added to the flexagon simulator</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yaacov Belenky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/632</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/632</guid>
      <description>I added the tuck flex to the Flexagon Simulator (http://flexagon.vlexo.net/scripts/FlexagonSimulator.cgi). Scott&#39;s identity VT=P holds - wherever &quot;vtupu&quot;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A sequence for 6-flexagon inversion</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/631</guid>
      <description>Nice flex sequence Yaacov.  I&#39;ll have to give that one a try... Scott Sherman ________________________________ From: &quot;ybelenky@...&quot; &lt;ybelenky@...&gt; </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: describing flex sequences</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:35:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/630</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/630</guid>
      <description>Interesting.  I always assumed the V was simply because of the shape involved. Ah yes, you can do the v-flex on other triangles flexagons.  I had tried various</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A sequence for 6-flexagon inversion</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yaacov Belenky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/629</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/629</guid>
      <description>By the way, there is a simple proof that the number of v-flexes (11) in this sequence is the minimal possible (assuming that only pinch flexes and v-flexes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A sequence for 6-flexagon inversion</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ybelenky@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/628</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/628</guid>
      <description>A 6-flexagon from 18-leaf straight strip has just two V-classes with rotational symmetry of order 3. Here is the sequence to flex it from one of these</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The V-flex</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Les Pook</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/627</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/627</guid>
      <description>Bruce Thanks for the information about your paper &#39;The combinatorics of all regular flexagons&#39;. I&#39;ve downloaded the paper, and am now trying to digest it. Les</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New flexagon page</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Yaacov Belenky</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/626</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/626</guid>
      <description>Scott,   I added the second item from your wishlist to my Flexagon Simulator (http://flexagon.vlexo.net/scripts/FlexagonSimulator.cgi) - to find which</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: describing flex sequences</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:59:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bruce McLean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/625</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/625</guid>
      <description>I do not think the following statement is true. &quot;the v-flex only works on flexagons made of equilateral triangles&quot; I named the  V-flex for my students Alan</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New flexagon page</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:34:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/624</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/624</guid>
      <description>I agree that a flexagon simulation is better aimed at exploring certain ideas rather than provide a full interactive animated experience.  But given the visual</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: describing flex sequences</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Scott Sherman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/623</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Flexagon_Lovers/message/623</guid>
      <description>Agreed, &lt;-1=&gt; looks a bit nonsensical as a math formula.  So I&#39;ve switched the silver tetra flex from R to St to leave RLU as alternates to &gt;&lt;^.  Sounds like a</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul  6 04:20:40 PDT 2009 -->
