<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>FtTuthill80 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/</link>
    <description>Az ScQRPions FtTuthill80 Transceiver</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: New Pic Firmware</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 19:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave AA7EE</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1212</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1212</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve recently changed my mind and decided that I do want a PIC chip with the newer V2 firmware.  I tried sending a direct message to you Dan via this group,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ft. Tuthill 80 New Build</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1211</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1211</guid>
      <description>Hi Wayne, How goes the build?  Making good progress? 73, Mark.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Haigwood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1210</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1210</guid>
      <description>Glad you found it George.  Have fun tonight! Jerry W5JH &quot;building something without experimenting is just solder practice&quot; ... From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 22:32:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GeorgeG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1209</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1209</guid>
      <description>Traced to problem with TR switching. Replaced Q2 no Joy! Replaced Q3 & Q4 Now all is well!  Hope the bands open tonite so we can add some contacts with it.  72</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GeorgeG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1208</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1208</guid>
      <description>The sign on message is very loud. I will get back at this tomorrow. Tnx Geo/W2BPI</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Haigwood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1207</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1207</guid>
      <description>George, Since the radio has a direct conversion receiver, the gain will be after the mixer.  Try injecting an audio signal after the mixer and follow with a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GeorgeG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1206</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1206</guid>
      <description>I added an audio amp to this rig. The side tone is extreamly loud, but not sigs. 72 George/W2BPI</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Haigwood</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1205</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1205</guid>
      <description>George, By weak receiver do you mean low audio?  This radio requires a set of headphones with a sensitivity of 105db or higher.  Most low cost headphones only</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weak rcvr</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>GeorgeG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1204</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1204</guid>
      <description>I have made several contacts with this rig. The rcv sigs seam very weak so hooked up my Norcal S9 signal generator to it. The sig is very weak indead. What</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ft. Tuthill 80 New Build</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:48:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dave AA7EE</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1203</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1203</guid>
      <description>Wayne - I built my Tut80 back in Feb 2010 and like Mark, experienced no problems with the building process. Excellent manual, and the little rig worked as it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ft. Tuthill 80 New Build</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1202</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1202</guid>
      <description>...and many thanks to the ScQRPions Amateur Radio club for putting the kits together -- great job! Mark.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ft. Tuthill 80 New Build</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1201</guid>
      <description>Hi Wayne, Just finished mine last week... Zero issues and the build manual is excellent with testing steps as you go and very clear pictures and deluxe layout</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ft. Tuthill 80 New Build</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 00:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Barney</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1200</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1200</guid>
      <description>Hi Wayne; I have one in my &#39;to do&#39; box along with about 10 or so others.  I can&#39;t answer either of your questions, but maybe we can compare notes on the Tut80,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ft. Tuthill 80 New Build</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wheeler2roh</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1199</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1199</guid>
      <description>I&#39;ve been fortunate to acquire an unbuilt Ft. Tuthill 80, and am exited to get started! Are there any mods recommended from just building the the instructions?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for CA3086 IC used in the FT TUT transceivers....</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Confrey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1198</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FtTuthill80/message/1198</guid>
      <description>Thanks for all the replies......After some research, I concluded that the CA3046 is actually a better version of the CA3086.  So I found some on Ebay and have</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss1.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Sat May 18 18:08:39 PDT 2013 -->
