<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ISO8601 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/</link>
    <description>To bring the International Date and Time Format to the attention of the Internet world and beyond.</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Successful Standards Have Rules For Range and Precision</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 21:20:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hjwoudenberg@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2171</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2171</guid>
      <description>In a message dated 5/14/2008 5:21:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time, PIEBALDconsult@... writes: Maybe. ... the same ... Not so much. ISO 8601 allows for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Successful Standards Have Rules For Range and Precision</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:20:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>piebaldconsult</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2170</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2170</guid>
      <description>... Maybe. ... the same ... Not so much. ISO 8601 allows for virtually unlimited range and precision, which is OK, for textual interchange, but impractical for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Successful Standards Have Rules For Range and Precision</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>hjwoudenberg@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2169</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2169</guid>
      <description>Most people wouldn&#39;t believe that today different  software gets different date/time results. Because: The industry does not have date/time standards for</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Date format for BC</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>johnmsteele</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2168</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2168</guid>
      <description>Well, at the time the guy with club didn&#39;t know he was supposed to count backwards. However ISO does define the date format for prior to current era.  The</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>date format for BC</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 06:06:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tex Texin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2167</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2167</guid>
      <description>I believe the typical date format in BC was the guy would club a woman over the head and drag her by her hair back to the cave. tex</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: No activity</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>nilamberbiswal</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2166</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2166</guid>
      <description>... What is the date format for BC ? nilambar biswal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>No activity</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>piebaldconsult</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2165</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2165</guid>
      <description>Wow, nothing since 2007-08-24.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If this has been fixed, I haven&#39;t herd about it.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>piebaldconsult</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2164</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2164</guid>
      <description>... (So tempted... so tempted...) ... I think my point may have been that you can&#39;t go directly from GPS-to- offset, you&#39;ll need some sort of lookup table</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If this has been fixed, I haven&#39;t herd about it.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>datefreak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2163</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2163</guid>
      <description>... globe, ... What other factors? Time zone is not defined in ISO 8601. Actual time shift between local (or standard) time and UTC is. And there, GPS comes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If this has been fixed, I haven&#39;t heard about it.</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 18:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dmweiten</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2162</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2162</guid>
      <description>Hi there, Very good points.  I considered this issue at some length when designing the time subsystem on the NxtPhase Relays and Recorders some years ago. I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should I bang my head on my desk?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>piebaldconsult</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2161</guid>
      <description>... Same way. ... &quot;What year?&quot;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wikipedia on ISO8601</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>piebaldconsult</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2160</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2160</guid>
      <description>I just took a quick look and nothing jumped out at me as being grossly wrong. What would be wrong is if a particular piece of not-quite-rightness were left</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If this has been fixed, I haven&#39;t herd about it.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>piebaldconsult</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2159</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2159</guid>
      <description>... Yes, but... time zone isn&#39;t strictly decided by location on the globe, there are other factors.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wikipedia on ISO8601</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>g1smd_amsat_org</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2158</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2158</guid>
      <description>[2007-Jul-13] I see that the Wikipedia entry for ISO 8601 has been heavily edited, mostly by one person. Several sections of the article, things that have been</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: If this has been fixed, I haven&#39;t herd about it.</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:45:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>datefreak</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2157</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ISO8601/message/2157</guid>
      <description>... phone or ... dozen  hours to ... US a ... standard. ... &quot;The world&quot; HAS that necessary standard. It&#39;s called: ISO 8601. In that standard, both UTC and Z</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Jul  9 02:43:48 PDT 2008 -->
