InsulinPumpersSupport at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Dexcom 7 and Medtronic

Bev O — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:11:40 GMT

Thanks Charlie, I think they are all going to be about the same but I wanted to try this as it means carrying around another device. That I'm not sure I

CGM's Abbott, Dexcom, Medtronic, and whoever

Florian — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:57:22 GMT

I have been following this thread with great interest because I'm also considering a CGM now that I know that BCBS MA will cover it for Hypo Unawareness. I

Re: Dexcom 7 and Medtronic

charlie conway — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:24:22 GMT

I seemed to know fairly "early on" that I liked the info from the Navigator CGM. I was in the JDRF Study along with Deb & Roger. I unlike Deb & Roger was in

Re: Dexcom 7 and Medtronic

DEB555 — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:05:30 GMT

... Great that they'll let you do that, Bev. Did you go directly through Patty or through the company itself? Please be aware that you can get an idea about

Re: Thank you all!

carol dunn — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:00:18 GMT

I was great to meet you as well. Carol Dunn ________________________________ From: tchafin99 To: InsulinPumpersSupport@yahoogroups.com

Re: Good meeting today, here are some World Diabetes Day photos

carol dunn — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:46:43 GMT

Thanks for the pics Bernard . It was good to see you at the meeting. Carol Dunn ________________________________ From: DEB555 To:

Dexcom 7 and Medtronic

Bev O — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:28:05 GMT

Dexcom has agreed to let me try their CGMS. I will get hooked up on Tuesday for a week.The week after Thanksgiving I'll do the blind one with Medtronic just

Re: Why no Veo?

tchafin99 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:01:41 GMT

... I really apologize. I didn't mean to put you on the spot. We will speak in someplace other than a public forum. I hope you're not offended. That was

Re: Why no Veo?

jennno@... — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:26:58 GMT

When I worked for MediSense/Abbott, our meters were only good for a certain altitude. Because the chemicals and enzymes were based on oxygen, the higher the

Re: Why no Veo?

DEB555 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:49:16 GMT

... Sorry Tom, I didn't say how much I disliked the Veo nor that it had "so many problems" . I said we'd talk later (more privately). This forum is certainly

Re: Why no Veo?

Bev O — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:36:19 GMT

Tom, I found when I lived in Calif. and would hike and backpack in the Sierra that my BGs would escalate. The elevation definitely had an impact on BGs. Bev.

Re: Why no Veo?

tchafin99 — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:17:02 GMT

... I would really like to try a 1-week trial of the Dexcom 7+ to compare real-time vs. my MM. I would even be willing to write up my impressions/findings if

Re: Why no Veo?

Bev O — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:09:03 GMT

thanks Bernard. Sometimes your joy is the source of your smile, but sometimes your smile can be the source of your joy. Thich Nhat Hanh ... From: Bernard

Re: Why no Veo?

Bernard — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:56:36 GMT

Of course I meant to say that I WOULD be surprised if things were the same a year from now. Bernard

Re: Why no Veo?

Bernard — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:53:45 GMT

Bev I'm on the Dexcom and I reported that I had gotten some reading with the receiver was upstairs. I think this was unusual, because I've also had nights