<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>J-mtDNA at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/</link>
    <description>J-mtDNA</description>

    <item>
      <title>Adding distant ancestors.  Was: Accessing database</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J. J. (Jim) Logan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/858</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/858</guid>
      <description>Harry and others: Project members add their own data describing ancestors.  You do this by going to your personal page and selecting User Preferences from the </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Accessing database</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:55:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harry Watson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/857</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/857</guid>
      <description>Re the first link below, the public web site provided by FTDNA, my results are listed there, identified only by my kit no. I would like to add the details of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heteroplasmy in mtDNA or Testing Issues?</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kinbuch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/856</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/856</guid>
      <description>Heard from FamilytreeDNA regarding calling Heteroplasmy as follows: &quot;Thank you for your email. Heteroplasmies are sometimes difficult to identify as they can</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Heteroplasmy in mtDNA or Testing Issues?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J. J. (Jim) Logan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/855</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/855</guid>
      <description>Sally: As I am sure you know, each cell has many mitochondria and each mitochondron has many copies of the DNA molecule.  In a mtDNA test, a heteroplasmy is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Heteroplasmy in mtDNA or Testing Issues?</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:59:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kinbuch</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/854</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/854</guid>
      <description>Previously, my Ancestry.com mtDNA testing revealed a heteroplasmic situation at 16090 in the HVR1 region and they typed me as 16090Y and in the haplogroup J. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do you still agree with your earlier publication from 2005 on FG</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J. J. (Jim) Logan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/853</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/853</guid>
      <description>Timo: The paper from which you are quoting is not mine.  Ian Logan is a fellow research in the UK with whom I exchange emails.  We are not related. But to your</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do you still agree with your earlier publication from 2005 on FGS?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:25:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Timo J. Penttilä</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/852</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/852</guid>
      <description>Thanks Jim, for your comment, it was helpful. I ran across a paper from 2005 where you state that &quot;complete mitochondrial DNA sequencing should not be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A mistake I presume</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:59:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J. J. (Jim) Logan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/851</guid>
      <description>Timo: I believe that error has already been corrected.  10499 is correct. ==================== J. J. (Jim) Logan Group Administrator, J-mtDNA and Logan DNA</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A mistake I presume</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Timo J. Penttilä</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/850</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/850</guid>
      <description>When the mutations between J2 and J2a are reported, in the table there are these mutations: T195C, A10499G, G11377A. But in the two-part diagram which I have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: J2/J2a</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Timo J. Penttilä</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/849</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/849</guid>
      <description>... It must necessarily be so that J2 is older than J2a. After J2 several mutations have taken place. - These are listed in Jim&#39;s article which has just come</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>J2/J2a</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>violinchick27</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/848</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/848</guid>
      <description>What makes the difference between J2 and J2a, which is older, is the difference in the coding region? Thanks vc27</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: J2 to J2a?</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>violinchick27</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/847</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/847</guid>
      <description>... Ongoing research will likely show that the Haplogroup J population of northern Italy has a higher percentage of J2 than that of southern Italy.  As shown</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My odds are 28% against the 23.7% for the average person</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:40:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Timo J. Penttilä</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/846</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/846</guid>
      <description>I have somewhat elevated odds for NIDDM or T2DM (by 23andMe), both abbreviations are in use. But as a second trait, which is certainly not included in this</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Introduction of me</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:29:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>wrtboyd</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/845</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/845</guid>
      <description>Hi Timo, I have been tested by 23andME.  They are very focused on the relationship between DNA and health.  They have 9 different markers they use to try and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hoorah! I am J2a1a!</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:10:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Timo J. Penttilä</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/844</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/J-mtDNA/message/844</guid>
      <description>I found the base no. 319 in my Genebase datasheet which is C! So in my case I have T319C which classifies me in the box J2a1a. So it is according to Jim&#39;s</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul 13 18:35:57 PDT 2009 -->
