http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/ Jal_developers Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:52:33 GMT Mark Gross http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1149 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1149 I'm porting my MarkIII sample programs from Jal0.4.62 to jalv2 and I'm having problems with the hex file output of the Jalv2 compiler. After futzing around a Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:03:16 GMT Eur van Andel http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1148 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1148 ... Actually Wouter's site is ABOVE the JAL wikipedia entry on Google, as are two other JAL pages. http://www.google.nl/search?q=jal (hit 7, 8, 9) Yes, google Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:49:19 GMT Mark Gross http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1147 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1147 ... Jalv0.4.xx has it hay day a few years ago. Since then its development has stagnated. In a sense it became "mature" in so much as it worked well enough Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:17:45 GMT WilliamChops Westfield http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1146 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1146 ... IIRC, there was never much development that happened on the JALv1 sourceforge project (or, never much productive development? Seemed like a lot of churn Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:14:22 GMT Eur van Andel http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1145 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1145 ... Jal V2 was a coup d'etat by some people. I have never installed it and never ran it. I rely on some weird JAL features ( like raw interrupts) that do not Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:12:13 GMT Mark Gross http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1144 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1144 I'm just starting to play with Jalv2, and the first thing I've noticed is that the URL for the source in almost all of the documentation out on the net point Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:03:53 GMT Marco Pantaleoni http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1143 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1143 Hi, I've spotted these lines in jpic.jal: var bit pin_e0_direction at trisc : 0 var bit pin_e1_direction at trisc : 1 var bit pin_e2_direction at trisc : 2 I Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:30:03 GMT Javier Martinez http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1142 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1142 Hi all, Available patches in jal.sf.net: ID Summary 1352435 10Fxxx support 1352433 Preprocessor support 1118846 JAL 16F648 Extensions Regards, Javi. Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:20:04 GMT Marco Pantaleoni http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1141 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1141 ... Yes, I understand. ... This sounds great! Thanks. In the meantime I'll try to come to a more integrated solution. I'll keep you posted. Cheers, Marco -- Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:59:23 GMT Javier Martinez http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1140 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1140 Hi all, ... Marco, you hit in the bulls eye. Ask in the jallist how many of them have a C compiler to build latest JAL sources .... ... and now think that Mon, 07 Nov 2005 23:00:31 GMT Marco Pantaleoni http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1139 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1139 ... I agree, but while on unix-like systems a pre-processor is (almost) always present, on other systems (windows), it is not. I'm not interested in windows Mon, 07 Nov 2005 18:42:09 GMT Stef Mientki http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1138 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1138 ... hello Marco, Javi, As a non-C-programmer, I cann't understand the full extend / consequences of this C-isch macro implementation, but here a few remarks: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:40:39 GMT Marco Pantaleoni http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1137 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1137 ... You are right, it would impede code sharing. I think of this feature as a "sharp knife", to be used exclusively when unavoidable, but I understand that Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:15:51 GMT Javier Martinez http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1136 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1136 Hi Marco, ... Yes, but what about sharing code? These macro functions will make JAL "other" language (JAL-cpp vs JAL), that is you'll not able to share code Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:58:35 GMT Marco Pantaleoni http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1135 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Jal_developers/message/1135 ... Yes, but if someone doesn't need it, he can just ignore it. One possible solution could be to selective enable the preprocessor support when running the