<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>JyotishGroup at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/</link>
    <description>The Jyotish Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:50:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sunil Bhattacharjya</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23982</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23982</guid>
      <description>Namaste Johnji, I shall only add that whenever the velocity of the particle is to exceed that of light, at that very point of time the excess energy is shedded</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: An innocANT question...</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rohiniranjan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23981</guid>
      <description>Who is Mr. Kaul? I do not know him or read any of his claims, etc.? Does he post on this forum? Would you kindly quote a few message numbers, if it is not too</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: An innocANT question...</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>harimalla@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23980</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23980</guid>
      <description>Could it be corrupted by inducting things that were later imported, as claimed by Mr. Kaul? Regards Hari Malla</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>harimalla@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23979</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23979</guid>
      <description>Dear Vinayji, I expected so much knowledge from a tapaswi like you.What you say is quite true.God or the Purush as the witness and Nature or Prakriti  as the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An innocANT question...</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rohiniranjan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23978</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23978</guid>
      <description>We have the Vedas and Puraanas and other scriptures and many others that I may not even have heard of. Others here must have because I see a lot of scholars</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:52:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rohiniranjan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23977</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23977</guid>
      <description>Beautiful post, visibly from deep within your soul, Vinay Ji! Excellent!! Best regards, Rohiniranjan</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Venus Williams chart</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:49:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rohiniranjan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23976</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23976</guid>
      <description>It must be a scary moment for the world, Manoj ji when both of us whole-heartedly agree! Like on this point ;-) I hope there is no bhookampa or Tsunami or</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:39:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23975</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23975</guid>
      <description>Namaste Vinayji, Thank you for the answer and explanation.  It was more than I expected. JR</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sunil Bhattacharjya</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23974</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23974</guid>
      <description>Vinay, You have misunderstood the statement. Bhagavata purana is the highest of the puranas. There is no doubt about it. However it does not define the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:14:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vinay Jha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23973</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23973</guid>
      <description>Sunil Da, I am surprised at your statement : &quot;Vayu purana, as that alone gives the correct definition of the Divya varsha&quot;. Should I reproduce your earlier</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vinay Jha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23972</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23972</guid>
      <description>&lt;&lt;&lt; Now it is found that the red-shift is due to other reasons. &gt;&gt;&gt; I have provided links to reputed astrophysicists (in an answer to Mr John who also refutes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vinay Jha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23971</guid>
      <description>God is not Matter. Matter is deduced from Maatr (Mother), the Triguni Adi Shakti or Mother Goddess or PRAKRITI whose constituent is Panchbhautika World. God is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:18:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vinay Jha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23970</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23970</guid>
      <description>To  All, When it is said that speed of light is the maximum speed for any particle with mass, speed in light in vacuum is meant. No particle having some rest</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:13:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sunil Bhattacharjya</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23969</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23969</guid>
      <description>Dear all, Quote it is true no particle having any rest mass can ever attain the speed of light, because it would have infinite mass which is impossible. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of the nakshatras</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Vinay Jha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23968</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JyotishGroup/message/23968</guid>
      <description>To All Concerned, About my previous message, Mr John wrote : &lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; This is an astute observation which took me a while to digest. In another forum, we talked</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Mon Jul 13 02:33:35 PDT 2009 -->
