<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>KeelyNet_Interact at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/</link>
    <description>KeelyNet_Interact@yahoogroups.com</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Antigravity</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Decker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1117</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1117</guid>
      <description>Hola Danny! Check this out; Roger J. SHAWYER - Electromagnetic Space Drive http://www.rexresearch.com/shawyer/shawyer.htm ... </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Antigravity</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:02:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>John Berry</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1116</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1116</guid>
      <description>Wachsmuth? Do you mean Wachspress? ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Antigravity</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:51:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry Decker</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1115</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1115</guid>
      <description>Hola Danny! No, hadn&#39;t seen that before...interesting but the video could have done a lot more if they put it on a balance scale and shown it lost weight.. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>psychotronic bomb detecting in Iraq</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Shaffer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1114</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1114</guid>
      <description>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=1 This looks like an Afilani / DielectroKinetics Labs device to me.  I have no idea</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E-mail I sent to a Post-doc at MIT concerning Keely&#39;s work, on 1</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:59:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>michael.ronfeldt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1113</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1113</guid>
      <description>I would have to agree with &quot;roland9519&quot;. I have work with many engineers that were the best and brightest in their field, but when it came to business they</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: E-mail I sent to a Post-doc at MIT concerning Keely&#39;s work, on 1</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:29:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1112</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1112</guid>
      <description>BRAVO ROLAND!!! Nice when people &#39;get it&#39; about Keely...too often they rely on biased articles which I think were written by envious scientists and engineers</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>E-mail I sent to a Post-doc at MIT concerning Keely&#39;s work, on 1 Nov</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>roland9519</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1111</guid>
      <description>An e-mail I sent to a Post-doctoral researcher at MIT, Alessandre Silvestri, who was quoted on Keelynet in her capacity as a commentator in New Scientist: In</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A Summation of a Unified Field Theory</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:14:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>michael.ronfeldt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1110</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1110</guid>
      <description>Hello everyone: Side note, watched a show about the universe this weekend, they stated that scientist are considering that the universe may not be total void</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A Summation of a Unified Field Theory</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mr. Bubb</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1109</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1109</guid>
      <description>Been trying for 10 years. Since you conclude that it is &#39;probable&#39;, then you must know something that convinces you.  You come up with a viable schematic or</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A Summation of a Unified Field Theory</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>demondoppel</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1108</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1108</guid>
      <description>&quot;I know that I&#39;m opening a can of worms here but I believe that the answer to the UFT is simply the Aether................. I say not only is it possible it is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T. Henry Moray</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1107</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1107</guid>
      <description>Hola Michael et al; Perhaps Richard Mckie&#39;s PodMod correlates with this; http://www.rexresearch.com/mckie/mckie.htm Resurrecting &#39;resonance&#39; theory McKie is a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T. Henry Moray + Other Goodies!</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:28:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1106</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1106</guid>
      <description>Hola Guys! Always read the comments, not that they are real, but sometimes they point out things that are missed.. For the first one...some of the commenters</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unified Field: Momentum and Acceleration</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>bkherbert99</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1105</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1105</guid>
      <description>When is a &#39;zero-G frog&#39; not a zero-G frog.  When it is an electrostatic frog.  If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T. Henry Moray + Other Goodies!</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:17:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James Stibbs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1104</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1104</guid>
      <description>Michael Ronfelt &amp; Everyone Else, Check out the following if You haven&#39;t already: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFqwY8q-5ZE </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T. Henry Moray</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>michael.ronfeldt</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1103</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/KeelyNet_Interact/message/1103</guid>
      <description>Just some thoughts on the Moray Valve. First off Moray loved radios and Tesla and I believe this invention was a combination of both of them. The Tesla part</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 12:52:21 PST 2009 -->
