LA_Rules_Discussion at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Composite bow strength bonuses

Lindsay — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:00:17 GMT

Thanks, James. (I was unclear on this because there is no limit listed on strength bows in the SRD, but the largest strength mentioned is +4.

Re: Upgrading items with multiple bonuses

James Zwiers — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:29:47 GMT

Those fall under the "non-standard items" header, which means they cannot be upgraded except via special certs. James

Upgrading items with multiple bonuses

James — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:27:03 GMT

For the life of me I cannot find this in the LARC or the Marketplace guide and it's driving me nuts. I have two items that each grant two bonuses (+2

Re: scrolls of 9th level spells - can't be purchased, correct?

Casey McGirt — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:29:02 GMT

... I meant spell, not scroll. -Casey -- "If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible; who still

Re: scrolls of 9th level spells - can't be purchased, correct?

Casey McGirt — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:28:44 GMT

... I thought that the favor rules allow you to get access to scribe a 9th level scroll by spending 9 levels worth of favors. (Disclaimer: I don't play an

scrolls of 9th level spells - can't be purchased, correct?

Paul Gerwe — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:09:32 GMT

Looking over the marketplace rules, it looks like you can't get scrolls of 9th level spells. Correct? Is there a way for Wizards to get access to 9th level

Re: Iron Body question

Casey McGirt — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:51:26 GMT

... I would assume so, but you'd still take (1/2) damage from the fire. ... As Iron Body gives you immunity to electricity, the immunity (and any other

Iron Body question

Paul Gerwe — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:18:58 GMT

The spell states that you gain the "iron golem vulnerabilities." Basically any electrical damage causes you to be slowed. So a few questions: 1. Is fire

Re: Spell Storing weapon - level cap?

Grant Bolling — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:50:58 GMT

Truthfully, I had already come to the same conclusion regarding what was a "targeted" spell. The list of spells given as "popular" (or something like that)

Re: Spell Storing. (was something else)

James Zwiers — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:11:28 GMT

Nope, sorry. You are still ignoring the single key element, which is there is a spell aiming method called "TARGET". If it doesn't use that its not a targetted

Re: Spell Storing. (was something else)

Benjamin F. Klahn KSC — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:08:03 GMT

The ambiguous wording is not in the ray spells but in the spell storing property. Casey noted earlier: From the SRD: "A spell storing weapon allows a

Re: Spell Storing. (was something else)

Patrick vander Reest — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:50:56 GMT

The problem with not allowing Ray type spells (and I can see the value to James' argument) is that you are basically limited to spells with a saving throw.

Re: Spell Storing. (was something else)

James Zwiers — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:50:43 GMT

Except that Target is a very specific means of producing an effect from a spell. Look at the 'Aiming a Spell' section of Core Rulebook I. Rays are not target

Re: Spell Storing. (was something else)

Benjamin F. Klahn KSC — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:33:02 GMT

From ray of enfeeblement: "You must succeed on a ranged touch attack to strike a target." Thus I believe ray of enfeeblement is a targeted spell. However, if

Re: Spell Storing. (was something else)

James Zwiers — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:47:28 GMT

Rays can't be stored in a spell-storing weapon. Sorry to burst your bubble, but a ray effect is not the same as a target. The spell description basically has