<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LDS-Debate at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/</link>
    <description>For honest and open debate, dialogue, and discussion of the LDS Standard Works, history, beliefs, and practices</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: One of Many Evidences that the LDS Church is True and that the C</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert M. Bowman, Jr.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20475</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20475</guid>
      <description>Allen, The problem with your method of handling sources is that the method could be used to &quot;support&quot; any conclusion regardless of the actual facts. Suppose I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One of Many Evidences that the LDS Church is True and that the C</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:42:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20474</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20474</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One of Many Evidences that the LDS Church is True and that the C</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert M. Bowman, Jr.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20473</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20473</guid>
      <description>Allen, Good catch on my misspelling of &quot;Ehrman.&quot; Your many &quot;amens&quot; to the teaching of the Gnostics is very troubling. You are apparently so intent on finding</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One of Many Evidences that the LDS Church is True and that the C</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20472</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20472</guid>
      <description>... ROB, I WILL TYPE MY RESPONSES IN CAPS FOR CLARITY AND EMPHASIS--NOT THAT I AM RANTING. I DISAGREE WITH YOUR OPINION THAT I DO NOT REPRESENT ISSUES FAIRLY</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: One of Many Evidences that the LDS Church is True and that the C</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:41:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert M. Bowman, Jr.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20471</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20471</guid>
      <description>Allen, You wrote: &lt;&lt; Many critics sit in judgment of the LDS Church and brand it as unChristian because it teaches some doctrines that are not shared by</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One of Many Evidences that the LDS Church is True and that the Criti</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:16:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20470</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20470</guid>
      <description>Many critics sit in judgment of the LDS Church and brand it as unChristian because it teaches some doctrines that are not shared by mainstream Christianity. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More on the Status of Women in the History of the Church</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20469</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20469</guid>
      <description>Rob, Thanks for your interest in the subject. I&#39;m sorry that I must have misquoted Kimball. Perhaps I got it mixed up with another quote. I know he touched on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More on the Status of Women in the History of the Church</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert M. Bowman, Jr.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20468</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20468</guid>
      <description>Allen, You wrote: &lt;&lt; No man can be a god without a woman at his side. No woman can be a goddess without a man at her side. As Paul said, the man is not without</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A Thorny Question</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Richard Massey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20467</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20467</guid>
      <description>Please see here (just cut and paste it into your address bar): </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Thorny Question</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:44:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20466</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20466</guid>
      <description>Critics quote the D&amp;C 84:21-22 which says that without the priesthood no man can see God and live. So how did Joseph Smith do it? Any thoughts on this? I have</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>More on the Status of Women in the History of the Church</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:36:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20465</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20465</guid>
      <description>No man can be a god without a woman at his side. No woman can be a goddess without a man at her side. As Paul said, the man is not without the woman, neither</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Status of Women in the History of the Church</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:20:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20464</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20464</guid>
      <description>One of the evidences that the Church is true is that it has always been in the forefront of the struggle for women&#39;s rights. This contradicts anti-LDS rumors</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Update on the Showdown with Critics</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20463</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20463</guid>
      <description>Well, it didn&#39;t happen. Darn it. The critics had thrown down the gauntlet, but when I gladly and enthusiastically accepted, they did not respond and did not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Latest News</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20462</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20462</guid>
      <description>A couple of days ago, I was invited to meet this coming Wednesday with 25 to 30 college-aged critics for a friendly bash on Mormonism. They say they want to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another Word on the Temple</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ahartnljean</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20461</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDS-Debate/message/20461</guid>
      <description>There seems to be some silence in the land. Obviously, you are all quite busy. And so I will use this lull to post a message FYI, since I am putting part of it</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Jul  5 11:13:18 PDT 2009 -->
