<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LDSUplift at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/</link>
    <description>LDS Uplift</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Titles and Names of Christ</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/155</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/155</guid>
      <description>Well, you&#39;re obviously right, as during the time of the Law people could not approach the Lord directly, only by the intercession of the High Priest, and the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Titles and Names of Christ</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/154</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/154</guid>
      <description>Thank you, Randy!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Titles and Names of Christ</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mnarich@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/153</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/153</guid>
      <description>I think that perhaps Abinidi knew the difference, but during his time (the Old Testament time) Jehovah was indeed worshiped as the Lord God (unless I&#39;m</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Titles and Names of Christ</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Randy Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/152</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/152</guid>
      <description>In 1916 the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles issued a Doctrinal Exposition on the Father and the Son.  It was published in the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Titles and Names of Christ</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/151</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/151</guid>
      <description>I was wondering if anyone has been asked why we do not believe in the Trinity when some prophets in The Book of Mormon apparently do not understand the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>arthvader</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/150</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/150</guid>
      <description>In simpler terms, the Lord can teach us anything he wants, but those things are binding only on ourselves and the people in our stewardship to whom those</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:11:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sam Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/149</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/149</guid>
      <description>Randy, I agree that if someone receives a revelation that they should marry a certain person, he/she shouldn&#39;t declare that revelation to the intended party.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mnarich@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/148</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/148</guid>
      <description>I agree, like Sam said, that because the gospel (and life) is multifaceted, commandments might not always be cut and dried. But this also implies another</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Randy Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/147</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/147</guid>
      <description>So perhaps, in lieu of stating that no one can receive revelation in behalf of another, perhaps it would be better to put it in less black-and-white terms. How</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Owen Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/146</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/146</guid>
      <description>Randy,   and Sam, I liked your viewpoints. Makes sense. Similar story. One of my daughters had a difficult time with her first baby nursing. My daughter had</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:03:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sam Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/145</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/145</guid>
      <description>Hi, Randy, For some reason, your post didn&#39;t seem to make it to distribution yesterday. I didn&#39;t think I had you on monitored status. So I went there to check</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Revelation scope</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Randy Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/144</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/144</guid>
      <description> Today in our Sunday School we talked about Hiram Page, who claimed to receive revelation beyond his area of stewardship. The teacher emphasized that no one</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Referrals</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>arthvader</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/143</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/143</guid>
      <description>Today I mentioned this group to a Latter-day Saint who apparently needs some friendly contact.  Let&#39;s remember that this site is about lifting one another up</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New Research for BofM</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Allen Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/142</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/142</guid>
      <description>Jerald, Thanks for sending this. It was very interesting. Allen ... From: Sam Richardson &lt;samueler@...&gt; Subject: [LDSUplift] New Research for BofM To:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Research for BofM</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Sam Richardson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LDSUplift/message/141</guid>
      <description>Kerry Shirts, an online LDS scholar, has written an article about BofM evidences. I would have to open my books and read them alongside his notes to understand</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec 23 06:19:53 PST 2009 -->
