<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LNGsafety at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/</link>
    <description>LNG Safety</description>

    <item>
      <title>Notice of Proposed Rule Making--Updates to Reporting Requirements</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dick Goldsmith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4840</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4840</guid>
      <description>Published in  July 2nd Federal Register: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-15532.htm Summary: This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeks to revise the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pipeline permitting bill dies; sponsor mourns for taxpayers</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marissa Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4839</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4839</guid>
      <description>Pipeline permitting bill dies; sponsor mourns for taxpayers by Ted Sickinger, The Oregonian Tuesday June 30, 2009, 10:42 PM </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LNG train car explodes in Italy- Please get real</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cliff Goudey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4838</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4838</guid>
      <description>Bob, The name of this forum is &quot;LNG Safety&quot;, not &quot;gasoline safety&quot; or &quot;flammable substance&quot; safety.  That probably explains the focus. The 5-15% quote was from</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LNG train car explodes in Italy- Please get real</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bob Stiles</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4837</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4837</guid>
      <description>How naive  most of you are! The statements made about LNG&#39;s flammability when taken in context are true. But the last poster who gave the flammability range</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Train explosion</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>forlng</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4836</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4836</guid>
      <description>Rory - some of the news reports are incorrect.  The car contained LPG, not LNG.  Liquid Petroleum (Propane/Butane) is more volatile</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LNG train car explodes in Italy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:47:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marissa Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4835</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4835</guid>
      <description>I am getting mixed reports on this. Some article say this is Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and others report Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). ... -- Marissa Rosati</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LNG train car explodes in Italy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:07:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>cliffgoudey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4834</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4834</guid>
      <description>... Gee, that is odd, because FERC, the LNG industry, and all the wild-eyed LNG terminal promoters assure us it simply can&#39;t explode.  I wonder if the victims</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LNG train car explodes in Italy</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:40:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Rory Cox</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4833</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4833</guid>
      <description>If LNG doesn&#39;t explode, what do you call this? This one train car was exponentially smaller than the storage tanks at import facilities and the tankers that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New offshore gas plan promising</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marissa Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4832</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4832</guid>
      <description>New offshore gas plan promising JUNE 29, 2009 http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20090629/OPINION01/906290305/New-offshore-gas-plan-promising There</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LNG &#39;fast-track&#39; bill stalled in Oregon Senate</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marissa Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4831</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4831</guid>
      <description>LNG &#39;fast-track&#39; bill stalled in Oregon Senate Proponents back off as budget becomes a priority BY NICHOLAS BELLOS The Forest Grove News-Times, Jun 24, 2009,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Louisiana terminal gets its first LNG shipment</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:09:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Marissa Cool</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4830</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4830</guid>
      <description>Louisiana terminal gets its first LNG shipment By TOM FOWLER Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle June 23, 2009, 12:40AM </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sipayik council votes to end project with Quoddy Bay LNG</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Godfrey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4829</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4829</guid>
      <description>The Quoddy Tides Eastport, Maine 2009 June 12 Sipayik council votes to end project with Quoddy Bay LNG by Edward French The Sipayik Tribal Council has voted to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tribe ends LNG contract with Quoddy Bay firm - Bangor Daily News</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Godfrey</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4828</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4828</guid>
      <description>Home | Log out | Manage Account | Subscribe 60?Rain | Sponsored by Bangor Hydro Friday, June 19, 2009 | Last Update: 4:18pm 6/18/09	 | 8 comments Tribe ends</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oil industry cranks up lobbying effort</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Carl Weimer</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4827</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4827</guid>
      <description>Hi Sandra, Yes the $85 was correct plus or minus $15. But don&#39;t worry I am going to spend a half day on the Hill in July and that amount will triple. While I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Estimate Places Natural Gas Reserves 35% Higher</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:54:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dick Goldsmith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4826</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LNGsafety/message/4826</guid>
      <description>URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/business/energy-environment/18gas.html?_r= 1 Estimate Places Natural Gas Reserves 35% Higher By JAD </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Jul  4 22:54:30 PDT 2009 -->
