<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPplatform-discuss at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/</link>
    <description>LPplatform-discuss</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Re : [LPplatform-discuss] Plank 3.2  &quot;Internal Security and Indi</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4785</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4785</guid>
      <description>(HH) Even during a war,  the government must have a warrant to search a building in the USA. (K) Ideology does not trump reality. Police do not need a warrant</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : [LPplatform-discuss] Plank 3.2  &quot;Internal Security and Individu</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harland Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4784</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4784</guid>
      <description>From : kevin Bjornson &lt;bjornsonkevin@...&gt; (K) The proposed wording is better, but the meaning of both is unclear. Does this mean, in war we must get a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Plank 3.2  &quot;Internal Security and Individual Rights&quot; -  Proposed</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4783</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4783</guid>
      <description>(K) The proposed wording is better, but the meaning of both is unclear. Does this mean, in war we must get a judge-issued search warrant before going into a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>&quot;Accountability of Government Officials&quot; -  Proposed additional plan</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harland Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4782</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4782</guid>
      <description>If you are on the Platform Committee and receive this,  please share my request with your colleagues. To LP PlatCom, Please consider this proposed additional</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Plank 3.6  &quot;Representative Government&quot; -  Proposed change</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harland Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4781</guid>
      <description>If you are on the Platform Committee and receive this,  please share my request with your colleagues. To LP PlatCom, Please consider this proposed change to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Plank 3.2  &quot;Internal Security and Individual Rights&quot; -  Proposed cha</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:25:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harland Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4780</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4780</guid>
      <description>If you are on the Platform Committee and receive this,  please share my request with your colleagues. To LP PlatCom, Please consider this proposed change to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LP PlatCom Meeting This Weekend</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Henry Haller</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4779</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4779</guid>
      <description>At the risk of beating a dead horse, I offer the following suggestion; in the proposed section 1.4: &quot;Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Platform rewrite</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>MICHAEL WILSON</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4778</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4778</guid>
      <description>Any updates on the rewrite of the platform? I understand the committee is meeting this weekend.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>competence, copyright, incorporation, free will</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:04:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Holtz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4777</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4777</guid>
      <description>Harland Harrison wrote: HH) It is absurd to define force and fraud as &quot;attempts to make choices for others&quot;. (HH The sentence in question doesn&#39;t attempt to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : Re : [LPplatform-discuss] LP PlatCom Meeting This Weekend</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 06:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harland Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4776</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4776</guid>
      <description>I promised more information, so I replied to some of Brian Holtz&#39; critique of my criticism of his changes in line, below. I hope that committee members will</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : [LPplatform-discuss] LP PlatCom Meeting This Weekend</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:00:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Holtz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4775</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4775</guid>
      <description>Harland Harrison wrote: I support Brian Holtz addition to Plank 3.5, which will protect children from abusive guardians. I oppose all the other changes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re : [LPplatform-discuss] LP PlatCom Meeting This Weekend</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Harland Harrison</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4774</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4774</guid>
      <description>Thanks for asking what members want in their platform. I disagree with Kevin Bjornson comments about alliances. I support Brian Holtz addition to Plank 3.5,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LP PlatCom Meeting This Weekend</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:03:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4773</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4773</guid>
      <description>3.1 National Defense &quot;The United States should both abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world and avoid entangling alliances.&quot; (K) By their very</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LP PlatCom Meeting This Weekend</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian Holtz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4772</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4772</guid>
      <description>The 2010 Libertarian Party Platform Committee is meeting this weekend in Las Vegas to adopt its report for the May 2010 convention. Perhaps due to satisfaction</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4771</guid>
      <description>DK - Show me one &quot;proper&quot; government in human history that hasn&#39;t ended up trampling freedom and killing multitudes of people. (K) show me one example of a</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 13:04:33 PDT 2010 -->
