<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPplatform-discuss at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/</link>
    <description>LPplatform-discuss</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4771</guid>
      <description>DK - Show me one &quot;proper&quot; government in human history that hasn&#39;t ended up trampling freedom and killing multitudes of people. (K) show me one example of a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Libertarian News</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4770</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4770</guid>
      <description>(K) Your equation: government = institutionalized intiation of force, is not supported by dictionaries, logic, or evidence. &quot;Govern&quot; (in a political context)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4769</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4769</guid>
      <description>(HP) Please keep in mind that definitions are not concepts and the lack of an all inclusive definition covering all the underlying concepts is not necessarily</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:08:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Howard Pearce</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4768</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4768</guid>
      <description>On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:09:27 -0400, kevin Bjornson ... Please keep in mind that definitions are not concepts and the lack of an all inclusive definition</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4767</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4767</guid>
      <description>(DK) You may not favor the &quot;current&quot; system, but you seem to be advocating for some level of government based upon your previous statement, &quot;...beneficial</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Libertarian News</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4766</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4766</guid>
      <description>I&#39;m glad that you have good reading skills and that we can agree on a few
points. Not all aggression comes from government, correct, but I am opposed to it no</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4765</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4765</guid>
      <description>... (HP) Being Arrested comes under the heading of defense against a perceived threat. If it is is done unjustly, then one may have recourse. (K) Yes, of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4764</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4764</guid>
      <description>1.  With all due respect, I&#39;m not interested in your reading ability or any self-aggrandizing. I&#39;m only interested in knowing whether or not you read, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Libertarian News</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4763</guid>
      <description>1.  With all due respect, I&#39;m not interested in your reading ability or any
self-aggrandizing. I&#39;m only interested in knowing whether or not you read,
and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Howard Pearce</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4762</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4762</guid>
      <description>On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:22:00 -0400, kevin Bjornson ... Being Arrested comes under the heading of defense against a perceived threat. If it is is done unjustly,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:22:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4761</guid>
      <description>(DK) Did you even read my article? (K) Yes, and my reading ability has been tested at the 99.9th percentile. (DK) Organization, itself, isn&#39;t the problem. (K)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Libertarian News</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4760</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4760</guid>
      <description>Did you even read my article? Organization, itself, isn&#39;t the problem. I think you&#39;re missing the point: There is no legitimate claim to me, by you
or any</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long&#39;s Non-PlatCom thread Re: On Rick Randall&#39;s comments</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4759</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4759</guid>
      <description>taxing aggression when it takes the form of pollution (K) This would not be a &quot;tax&quot;, but a fine. taxing aggression when it takes the form of appropriating</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long&#39;s Non-PlatCom thread Re: On Rick Randall&#39;s comments</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:18:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4758</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4758</guid>
      <description>enforcing a due-process-observing monopoly on retaliatory force; (K) First, &quot;due process&quot; incorporates Spencer&#39;s Social Statics, so the current system often</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [LongThread] anarchy vs. minarchy - burden of proof</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 09:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kevin Bjornson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4757</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LPplatform-discuss/message/4757</guid>
      <description>(K) Thanks, Brian, for the Pinker article. Very good reading and I agree, modernity and  humanism do tend to reduce levels of aggression and we are headed in</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Nov 10 07:55:58 PST 2009 -->
