LPplatform-discuss at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Lew Rockwell blogger likes moderated LP Platform

kevin Bjornson — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:06:36 GMT

(K) When someone at LRC says he likes the new platform, I wonder what is wrong with it. People should be allowed to freely move across political borders, so

Lew Rockwell blogger likes moderated LP Platform

Brian Holtz — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:55:47 GMT

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance164.html Laurence Vance disapprovingly quotes the 2004 immigration plank and writes: " Fortunately, the Libertarian Party

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

M&M Robertson — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:27:37 GMT

... From: kevin Bjornson To: lpplatform-discuss@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:35 PM Subject: RE: [LPplatform-discuss] Quantum Theory of

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty

M&M Robertson — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 04:09:01 GMT

Even if you "transfer your right to self-defense", which I see as simply authorizing someone to aid in your self-defense, it in no way obstructs your own

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty

kevin Bjornson — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:46:10 GMT

The concept that rights are "inalienable" does not mean that the exercise of a right cannot be restricted or risked by contract, a process called disablement,

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

kevin Bjornson — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:39:54 GMT

(HP) Better example yet is that it is not possible for one to contract away one's free will or sell onseself into slavery as the concept of a contract would

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

kevin Bjornson — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:35:54 GMT

Mik: The owner of those rights may choose to not exercise them either by simple choice or by contract, or may forfeit them through certain actions.The word

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty

Jon Roland — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:38:33 GMT

The concept that rights are "inalienable" does not mean that the exercise of a right cannot be restricted or risked by contract, a process called disablement ,

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

M&M Robertson — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:31:14 GMT

Good point. ... From: "Howard Pearce" To: Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 7:34 AM Subject: Re:

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

Howard Pearce — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:34:37 GMT

... I don't think I believe that a person can alientate or give up his/her rights .. He may make contracts or trades which impact his future choices but he

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

M&M Robertson — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:22:58 GMT

... From: kevin Bjornson To: lpplatform-discuss@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 4:26 PM Subject: RE: [LPplatform-discuss] Quantum Theory of

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

kevin Bjornson — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:26:15 GMT

Mik: There is a difference between someone taking your rights from you and you forfeiting your rights. (k) I didn't deny that. My point is, a person may

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

M&M Robertson — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:06:30 GMT

... From: kevin Bjornson To: lpplatform-discuss@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 4:43 PM Subject: RE: [LPplatform-discuss] Quantum Theory of

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

kevin Bjornson — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:43:08 GMT

Mik: You could say something was justified if it secured a right, correct? (K) Certainly, no. For example, I have a right to life. Suppose I am under threat

Re: Quantum Theory of Liberty (was Right to life NIF)

M&M Robertson — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:01:56 GMT

... From: kevin Bjornson To: lpplatform-discuss@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 4:13 PM Subject: RE: [LPplatform-discuss] Quantum Theory of