<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LinuxRMS at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/</link>
    <description>Linux RMS-Gateway</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: RMS upgrade</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ns7c</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1306</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1306</guid>
      <description>Yeah, I wanted to make sure I could get to 2.2.0 before the 2.3.0 release came out. Thanks, -Scott</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RMS upgrade</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:03:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>k4gbb</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1305</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1305</guid>
      <description>Scott, The WL2K Dbase is often slow in updating. In any case just hang loose... the next generation is about to be released. Brian is trying to beat the Jun</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RMS upgrade</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:48:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ns7c</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1304</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1304</guid>
      <description>Hi All, I just got around to upgrading my RMS Gateway from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0. The upgrade went fine, and when I connect on RF it shows v2.2.0, however, the RMS</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:08:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1303</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1303</guid>
      <description>Hi Torsten! Unfortunately it took some time until I could dig into it and I found one reason, why the Pactor terminal program does not start rmsgw in Pactor</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upcoming Linux RMS Gateway Changes [was: Re: [LinuxRMS] Re: RMS </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 15:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian R. Eckert - W3SG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1302</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1302</guid>
      <description>Thanks for your message Lor. All: I am pushing to complete the work on this change ASAP and expect to have software for your use within the next several days.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:38:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>la7um</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1301</guid>
      <description>Torsten. The system of Hans, including the delay, did and do work so well seen from Norway, that when my club LA3F applied for enabling a Pactor RMS we aimed</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upcoming Linux RMS Gateway Changes [was: Re: [LinuxRMS] Re: RMS Gate</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 13:08:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>lorrring</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1300</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1300</guid>
      <description>Hi Brian, I&#39;m wondering how you are progressing with the new version 2.3? I wanted to give you a heads up about our planned phaseout of the old CMS</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tharenberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1299</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1299</guid>
      <description>Hi Hans, thank you so much!!! I like this setup, it&#39;s so flexible!! ... I think I have it nearly running. Sent you a private mail (as I wanted to show you some</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 09:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1298</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1298</guid>
      <description>Hi Torsten! You are obviously the first and only one within the last 5 years who gives that HF installation a try. ... or the others just gave up without</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tharenberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1297</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1297</guid>
      <description>Dear all, this goes out to anybody running also a PACTOR setup. I think I finished with the setup and thanks to a pair of old-syle credentials we had, I could</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:45:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tharenberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1296</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1296</guid>
      <description>Sorry for the noise, figured that out myself (it&#39;s just the socket, so that was easy). As I received the (new style) credentials yesterday only, I fear we&#39;re</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pactor setup help</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tharenberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1295</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1295</guid>
      <description>Dear Hans, I try to do the same setup as you described here @ PJ2A in Curacao. I&#39;m familiar with tnt (and also Kernel AX.25 although not needed for PACTOR) and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Upcoming Linux RMS Gateway Changes [was: Re: [LinuxRMS] Re: RMS Gate</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 10:12:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Brian R. Eckert - W3SG</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1294</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1294</guid>
      <description>We are currently working on release 2.3 which implements the new security. There are some issues yet in that code that we are working through before having a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RMS Gate credentials</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert F Jarvis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1293</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1293</guid>
      <description>Charley Something funny happened on the way to the theatre - of sorry wrong show! Ref the WL2K Passwords thingy. We (you and I) found I had to use JUST the </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RMS Gate credentials</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>k4gbb</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1292</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LinuxRMS/message/1292</guid>
      <description>Roger, rmsgw-2.2.0-147 is the latest version. When it was released at the end of last year it was announced that the passwd & key were no longer needed for</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- rss2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com uncompressed Wed Jun 19 18:51:16 PDT 2013 -->
