Literature at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Vedr. [Literature] J. D. Salinger's unpublished 'gold mine'

Stephen Fawcus — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:45:42 GMT

I like Malick's movies, The New World was amazing and Badlands was too. ... From: To: Sent: Monday, February

Re: Vedr. [Literature] J. D. Salinger's unpublished 'gold mine'

Cinearte@... — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:14:53 GMT

Word is that Salinger made a deal with Terrence Malick after Days of Heaven for Catcher in the Rye. The stipulation was that he could not start production

Vedr. [Literature] J. D. Salinger's unpublished 'gold mine'

morten hansen — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:21:36 GMT

What annoys me is that Salinger could have had Elia Kazan who made A streetcar Named Desire with Brando to make the film or he could have had Billy Wilder.

J. D. Salinger's unpublished 'gold mine'

Vigilius Haufniensis — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:44:01 GMT

http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/books/article/757991--j-d-salinger-s-unpublished-gold-mine J. D. Salinger's unpublished 'gold mine' Literary, film worlds

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

morten hansen — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:35:17 GMT

Here's a joke about Arabs in the West that i found in another group Mohammed entered his classroom on the first day of school. “What is your

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

paulmatthew — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:00:33 GMT

It is a fallen world and no mistake. pm ... From: Cinearte@... To: Literature@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 1:29 PM Subject: Re:

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

Cinearte@... — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:30:15 GMT

Fires, floods, mudslides, blackouts, earthquakes, plane crashes, a slew of inane celebrity deaths, and this is only in LA in the last three months. Enough to

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

paulmatthew — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:10:41 GMT

I never recognize my points after you've filtered them. What's up with that? How's the news biz? pm ... From: Cinearte@... To: Literature@yahoogroups.com

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

paulmatthew — Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:56:56 GMT

No problem Doug. You and I can communicate just fine on this level. We seem to be able to grant each other some space for mutual understanding, and benefit of

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

Doug Smith — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:37:47 GMT

Hi y'all, "Yes, Doug's argument is fallacious." Was I arguing? Is it possible to argue something that one just feels is probably accurate but is far from

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

Doug Smith — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:28:09 GMT

Hi Paul, I hope you're doing well and that your holidays were gentle. I guess it is more intuition. I think it would be impossible to know, with any degree

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

paulmatthew — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:40:01 GMT

Relax bro. No one's character was attacked. I'll reaffirm that I think you're an all right guy once again, as I have so many times. It doesn't stretch

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

Ed Tyler — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:36:59 GMT

What a curious attitude! I'm somehow not interested in "accuracy" if I challenge the phrasing of a question in such a manner that it presents a false

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

Cinearte@... — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:16:45 GMT

Paul! I'm surprised to hear you admit that your complete worldview is not grounded on anything more concrete than faith. ... From: paulmatthew

Re: Former discussion about Quran and Science - if anyone is still i

paulmatthew — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:03:10 GMT

I get that you sometimes care very deeply about accuracy and articulation. I'll concede the addition of "or other" to the question I asked. The assertions,