MEG_builders at Yahoo! Groups

Info about the MEG core's hysteresis curve

mayerstan — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:22:04 GMT

Group, Recently I had a phone conversation with a serious MEG experimenter who shared with me some information about the MEG core that apparently comes from a

Re: Meg Project

magn0mite — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:41:02 GMT

Hi Congratulations for your work. If you could include a drawing with your data, it would be greatly appreciated. I notice time plays the same tricks on you as

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

Norman — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:40:47 GMT

I haven't posted in a long time because not much has happened with my AMCC1000 core. After meeting Don Smith in 2007, it became a possibility that operation of

Re: Meg Project

Vincent J Cataldi — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:09:56 GMT

... may the Force be with you. Best wishes, think positive, please. - Vince

Meg Project

goreggie951 — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:26:24 GMT

As a new group member, with a Metglas AMCC 320 core 1) With a plug in transformer (15.23 DC volts 1.5 amps) to the input board tuned to 12.43k we read.... 2)

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

mayerstan — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:11:27 GMT

... LES, MY REPLIES ARE EMBEDDED IN ALL CAP TEXT WITHIN YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE BELOW. STAN MAYER ... PLEASE ELABORATE ON "CERTAIN CHANGES" AS I HAVE SEEN

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

leskraut — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:50:25 GMT

***** PREFACE BY GROUP MODERATOR ******* I am approving this posting with some trepidation that it might spur a round of THEORY discussion. What's the problem

Re: MEG Redesign

jules4060 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:47:41 GMT

Keep in mind that many of the original MEG experiments used materials like metglass OR orthonol that have a nearly othogonal hysterisis curve. These materials

MEG Redesign

starraider25 — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:06:03 GMT

Considering that no one seems to be able to get any O/U from the MEG, maybe we should try to redesign it a bit. Bearden talked about barium in BaFe magnets

permanent magnet generator utilizing a rotating field

emc3_llc — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:24:07 GMT

US Patent # 5,221,892 discloses a permanent magnet generator which incorporates solid state flux control valves and a rotating field across inductive elements

Re: Permanent magnet flip-flop: Theories have been offered, please p

Stan Mayer — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:31:22 GMT

... Vince, Your posting has gotten a lot of potential answers to your question about magnet reversal and I hope that you find your answer within them. I

Proposal of the shift in polarity of a broken magnet

brendantownsenduk — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:21:09 GMT

It is my belief that a magnetic field is effectively a moving mass, involving constant rotation of the ether from one pole to the other. So, these are my

Re: Permanent magnet flip-flop: with possible with half gainer

ragman — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:20:52 GMT

Hi Vince, Could you describe your setup a bit more, I have the impression that: Your anvile is ferromagnetic (as opposed to say a brick)? Your magnets

Re: Permanent magnet flip-flop: with possible with half gainer

Phil Karn — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:20:45 GMT

What you describe is exactly what physics books have described for centuries. Any energy you could generate with this scheme would come out of the energy it

Reply to Vincent, HJ Mgnet Motor Replicated

Charles Couch — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:20:43 GMT

Vincent: Leedskilnin, the builder of Coral Castle wrote a book that might give you some insight into what is happening. In it he gives experiments that display