MEG_builders at Yahoo! Groups

MEG_Builders is closing down

mayerstan — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:01:13 GMT

Dear MEG_Builders member, This message is to let you know that on Oct. 7, 2010 the Yahoo MEG_Builders group will be closed down. The reasons for this are many

Re: secondary problem

Gufo Rosso — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:39:22 GMT

... From: "gufo_rosso@..." To: Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2010 10:38 PM Subject: [MEG_builders]

secondary problem

gufophp@... — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:06:55 GMT

I have a problem on the secondary leakage current I thought I put the tape (the black one) between a secondary winding and another to evid losses. I do not

Re: Info about the MEG core's hysteresis curve

jules4060 — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:39:18 GMT

This is not necessarily new news to some people. If you really think the critical factor is the B/H curve then get a bunch of small strip wound toroidal cores

Info about the MEG core's hysteresis curve

mayerstan — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:22:04 GMT

Group, Recently I had a phone conversation with a serious MEG experimenter who shared with me some information about the MEG core that apparently comes from a

Re: Meg Project

magn0mite — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:41:02 GMT

Hi Congratulations for your work. If you could include a drawing with your data, it would be greatly appreciated. I notice time plays the same tricks on you as

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

Norman — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:40:47 GMT

I haven't posted in a long time because not much has happened with my AMCC1000 core. After meeting Don Smith in 2007, it became a possibility that operation of

Re: Meg Project

Vincent J Cataldi — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:09:56 GMT

... may the Force be with you. Best wishes, think positive, please. - Vince

Meg Project

goreggie951 — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:26:24 GMT

As a new group member, with a Metglas AMCC 320 core 1) With a plug in transformer (15.23 DC volts 1.5 amps) to the input board tuned to 12.43k we read.... 2)

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

mayerstan — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:11:27 GMT

... LES, MY REPLIES ARE EMBEDDED IN ALL CAP TEXT WITHIN YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE BELOW. STAN MAYER ... PLEASE ELABORATE ON "CERTAIN CHANGES" AS I HAVE SEEN

Re: problem with the MEG as described in the patent

leskraut — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:50:25 GMT

***** PREFACE BY GROUP MODERATOR ******* I am approving this posting with some trepidation that it might spur a round of THEORY discussion. What's the problem

Re: MEG Redesign

jules4060 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:47:41 GMT

Keep in mind that many of the original MEG experiments used materials like metglass OR orthonol that have a nearly othogonal hysterisis curve. These materials

MEG Redesign

starraider25 — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:06:03 GMT

Considering that no one seems to be able to get any O/U from the MEG, maybe we should try to redesign it a bit. Bearden talked about barium in BaFe magnets

permanent magnet generator utilizing a rotating field

emc3_llc — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:24:07 GMT

US Patent # 5,221,892 discloses a permanent magnet generator which incorporates solid state flux control valves and a rotating field across inductive elements

Re: Permanent magnet flip-flop: Theories have been offered, please p

Stan Mayer — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:31:22 GMT

... Vince, Your posting has gotten a lot of potential answers to your question about magnet reversal and I hope that you find your answer within them. I