<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Microscope at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/</link>
    <description>Microscopy as a hobby or profession.</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Photo software</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gpeyton42</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46944</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46944</guid>
      <description>Lionel - Where did you buy your DCM300? I thought AmScope supplied ScopePhoto with their scopes, but they dont specify any more. John (ctdrice) and Kevin - </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New imports vs. used old microscopes</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>timchandler2001</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46942</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46942</guid>
      <description>I have both a B&amp;L Dynascope bought on eBay fairly cheap, and a Chinese &quot;Steindorff&quot; import bought from Mel Sobel which I actually paid more for than the B&amp;L.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Photos with Microscope</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gpeyton42</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46941</guid>
      <description>Mike - Nice web site with lots of good links. I wasn&#39;t able to find photos of adapters built out of PVC though, unless it&#39;s the one with the plastic screws in</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Darkfield and Abbe</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:04:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brn_matsumoto</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46940</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46940</guid>
      <description>I was reading Needham&#39;s Practical Use of the Microscopy and came across an interesting line about how the Abbe&#39;s theory of imaging did not explain some</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New imports vs. used old microscopes</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:54:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ronmschwartz</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46939</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46939</guid>
      <description>Hi, I am about a month new to this group, so this topic may have been posted here before. I have been thinking about buying a binocular microscope, or one with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nikon Microscopes</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:34:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46938</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46938</guid>
      <description>Anyone know of a good guide or website to the classic Nikon microscopes and optics.  Trying to figure out whcich ones are 210 TL or 160 and what objectives go</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>last ditch eyepiece cleaning</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>a.johnw</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46937</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46937</guid>
      <description>I use a traveling microscope to check eyepieces and objectives for muck etc. It&#39;s old and I have cleaned it&#39;s eyepiece and a small internal lens/graticule with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Olympus PME questions</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>a.johnw</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46936</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46936</guid>
      <description>I really mustn&#39;t jump to conclusions about objective types. All of the objectives have a parfocal height of close to 45mms so they must be din. For some reason</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anoptral contrast</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 05:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brn_matsumoto</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46935</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46935</guid>
      <description>Thank you for the message. I do not have a Reichert stand, fortunately, the Heine condenser will provide the cone of light for the anoptral lenses and I can</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anoptral contrast</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ross Ferris</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46934</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46934</guid>
      <description>I have an anoptral set up of 4 objectives and a rotating condenser turret that I use frequently. It was made by Meopta a Chech producer of optical equipment.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Computer Microscopes.. was Re: A Question about SEMs?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:53:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gordon Couger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46933</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46933</guid>
      <description>Hi John, We have very different programming back grounds. I see problems from a different point of view than you do. I see the problem as one of making the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anoptral contrast</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:39:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>brn_matsumoto</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46932</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46932</guid>
      <description>Hi everyone: On Ebay, I noticed an Anoptral contrast setup--it is rather unusual in that it is made by Zeiss Oberkochen.  Apparently, it is a custom made to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Olympus PME questions</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:02:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>dljones</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46931</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46931</guid>
      <description>I believe you are correct, 160mm tube length. dj</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Computer Microscopes.. was Re: A Question about SEMs?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:49:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J Forster</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46930</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46930</guid>
      <description>Hi Gordon, ... Those were early days, before PCs became ubiquitous. ... It depends on what you are doing. A single lab setup or a product. IMO, for a lab setup</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Olympus PME questions</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:55:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>a.johnw</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46929</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/message/46929</guid>
      <description>Does anyone know what tube length the early jis PME&#39;s used? It looks like the usual 160mms but I can&#39;t seem to get that odd 40x din length objective to focus. </description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr3.grp.scd.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Tue Oct  7 11:21:20 PDT 2008 -->
