<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MindBrain at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/</link>
    <description>Mind and Brain</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mentor612</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18490</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18490</guid>
      <description>Space IS in motion. All the time. There is an extreamly important point that has been missed here. It is the issue of Color. There is never ever at any time</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resonant field coherence.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yanniru</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18489</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18489</guid>
      <description>Not true. The origin of dark matter comes from an analysis using Newton&#39;s equations, not any equations of relativity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resonant field coherence.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:39:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>chris lofting</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18488</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18488</guid>
      <description>... your stubbornness in NOT reading the literature etc shows your fear in moving into an area you obviously know nothing about - since that for you is an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>beingnowhere</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18487</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18487</guid>
      <description>The wave appears to move across the ocean, the water itself does not. Motion ... energy ... sentience ... are all qualities of, aspects of, infinite space. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cass Silva</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18486</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18486</guid>
      <description>We see energy as expanding space in motion - but what if it was counteracted or equilibrialised by contracting space in motion?   Every star, planet and atom</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cass Silva</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18485</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18485</guid>
      <description>Well in all fairness Tom, Einstein doesn&#39;t either.  Einstein&#39;s field equation goes to infinity - what some call - nasty infinity - it is ignored and called</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cass Silva</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18484</guid>
      <description>I was referring to singularity that is infinite mass contained in singularity.  Singularity being the zero point from where all expansion occurs. I am musing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resonant field coherence.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cass Silva</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18483</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18483</guid>
      <description>you postulated magic between near relatives.  What you call continuum effect is merely the copying of one random act by another.  I see it everyday with my</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resonant field coherence.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Cass Silva</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18482</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18482</guid>
      <description>According to Haramein, the correllous effect could not be explained, so instead of revising the equations, science conveniently postulated that it must be</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> News: Three of a kind ~ Revealing languages universal essence</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Karl Stonjek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18481</guid>
      <description>Three of a kind: Revealing language?s universal essence November 20th, 2009 in Other Sciences / Social Sciences Graphic: Christine Daniloff (PhysOrg.com) --</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>News: The court will now call its expert witness ~ the brain</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:19:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Karl Stonjek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18480</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18480</guid>
      <description>The court will now call its expert witness: the brain November 20th, 2009 in Medicine &amp; Health / Neuroscience Enlarge Illustration by Jeffrey Decoster </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>News: Your Brain on Books</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Karl Stonjek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18479</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18479</guid>
      <description>Mind Matters -  November 17, 2009 Your Brain on Books Neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene explains his quest to understand how the mind makes sense of written</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>News: The Will to Power--Is &quot;Free Will&quot; All in Your Head?</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robert Karl Stonjek</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18478</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18478</guid>
      <description>Scientific American Mind -  November 16, 2009 The Will to Power--Is &quot;Free Will&quot; All in Your Head? Neurosurgeons evoke an intention to act during brain surgery </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yanniru</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18477</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18477</guid>
      <description>The topic is the claim &quot;energy is space in motion&quot;. At first this seems like an oxymoron as generally motion is defined a the change of location of a test mass</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Energy-space in motion?</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>tom9401</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18476</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/message/18476</guid>
      <description>Leon fails to account for relativity itself. -Tom</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov 21 02:06:08 PST 2009 -->
