Minolta-Manual-Focus at Yahoo! Groups

MD ZOOM 35-70mm 1:3.5 faulty?

mamdj — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:12:56 GMT

Hi All, I recently added to the lens collection for my SRT-303 with an "MD ZOOM 35-70mm 1:3.5 MACRO. This is the last version before the variable aperture one

Re: for all you skeptics

Mary Pinkerton — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:23:59 GMT

Thank you for that response. : )The 16mm film is looking very good indeed. ... From: Philip Q Subject: Re: [MinMan] for all you skeptics

Re: for all you skeptics

Philip Q — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:17:34 GMT

It looks like to me that what you are interpreting as a scratch is a cord or cable hanging from the lamp (bell?). There is a shadow associated with this

Re: for all you skeptics

xkaes@... — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:45:22 GMT

In a message dated 11/9/09 8:48:58 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, mpink2002@... writes: Is there something in your darkroom that is slidding along the

Re: for all you skeptics

Mary Pinkerton — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:47:50 GMT

As I look at the images . They share the same scratch marks on the white door. Look above the door on the right. The scratch mark goes right through the

for all you skeptics

xkaes@... — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:14:16 GMT

For all you skeptics, I've got some interesting results. Check out: _http://www.subclub.org/minman/page2.html_ (http://www.subclub.org/minman/page2.html)

Nikon F (Yes, I know it's NOT a Minolta ... but it IS manual!)

ljmagnuson@... — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:08:55 GMT

Hey, just got to get on here and brag a bit. Got an old Nikon F SLR from a local pawnbroker a few days ago who had a priced at $20 thinking it was broken. I

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:35:41 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 9:20:34 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, DavidChicago@... writes: Joe, There is a link to Minman in the group signature. _ When a

Re: 16mm quality

David — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:20:07 GMT

Joe, There is a link to Minman in the group signature. _ When a person clicks on this it is a broken link since you took minman down. Do you really want folks

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:19:37 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 9:09:09 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: If the MINMAN site is no longer there, I don't think there

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:03:56 GMT

... If the MINMAN site is no longer there, I don't think there is a need to include its URL. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:53:07 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:46:55 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: Let's try this again: Under each message there is a block

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:46:39 GMT

... Let's try this again: Under each message there is a block of text, starting with: MINMAN rules (Pretty darn simple): After the rules you have this: <+> To

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:30:13 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:26:44 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:26:38 GMT

... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]