Minolta-Manual-Focus at Yahoo! Groups

Nikon F (Yes, I know it's NOT a Minolta ... but it IS manual!)

ljmagnuson@... — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:08:55 GMT

Hey, just got to get on here and brag a bit. Got an old Nikon F SLR from a local pawnbroker a few days ago who had a priced at $20 thinking it was broken. I

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:35:41 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 9:20:34 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, DavidChicago@... writes: Joe, There is a link to Minman in the group signature. _ When a

Re: 16mm quality

David — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:20:07 GMT

Joe, There is a link to Minman in the group signature. _ When a person clicks on this it is a broken link since you took minman down. Do you really want folks

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:19:37 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 9:09:09 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: If the MINMAN site is no longer there, I don't think there

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 16:03:56 GMT

... If the MINMAN site is no longer there, I don't think there is a need to include its URL. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:53:07 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:46:55 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: Let's try this again: Under each message there is a block

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:46:39 GMT

... Let's try this again: Under each message there is a block of text, starting with: MINMAN rules (Pretty darn simple): After the rules you have this: <+> To

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:30:13 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:26:44 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:26:38 GMT

... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:26:02 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:24:40 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: I mean the bit I highlighted in bold. ... There wasn't

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:24:36 GMT

... I mean the bit I highlighted in bold. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:15:33 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:01:14 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: It's sad that there are those who pinch other people's

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:14:53 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 8:01:14 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: Thanks for the tip; I might just be enticed to load up

Re: 16mm quality

Samuel Tang — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:01:01 GMT

... Thanks for the tip; I might just be enticed to load up some cassettes, better look into film splitters: only if they make a splitter for cutting 120 films,

Re: 16mm quality

xkaes@... — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:19:10 GMT

In a message dated 11/1/09 6:50:47 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, samuel_tang@... writes: It makes me wonder if the higher-grade focussing lens in