<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Myopiafree2 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/</link>
    <description>Myopiafree2</description>

    <item>
      <title>The Intellectual Blindness of the Majority-opinion OD.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:09:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3786</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3786</guid>
      <description>Subject:  Here is the rationale. Judy is not correct. The minus has been used for the last 400 years -- since it was used by Johann Kepler to clear his vision</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>For Judy -- Answering a question -- with a different question -- doe</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:19:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>otisbrown17268</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3785</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3785</guid>
      <description>Dear Judy, Subject: Dealing with people who are &quot;evasive&quot; and wish (exclusively) to perpetuate the status quo. I will post this here -- for response later. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snellen Clearing in &quot;Functional Myopia&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3784</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3784</guid>
      <description>Subject: Where Dr. Bates was correct. But, as the years go by, it would be wise to include the use of the preventive plus,  in this process. Which is wear both</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Simple Question on Snellen -- More Difficult Answer.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:54:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3783</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3783</guid>
      <description>Subject: Layman question. Layman:  Tell us, line by line of the snellen, what each line represents as a pair of glasses. The top line equals . the ninth line =</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Retinoscope, Phoropter and &quot;Tiral Lenses&quot; explained by OD st</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3782</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3782</guid>
      <description>... Subject:  It is just not that difficult. In the final analysis, I can do a more accurate job with my own trial lens kit. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dr. Orfield calls stair-case myiopa, &quot;Doctor-CAUSED&quot; or &quot;Iatrogenic&quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3777</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3777</guid>
      <description>Why I support second-opinion PREVENTION, with prevention to START before any minus lens is applied.  Dr. Bates described this &quot;threshold&quot; situation as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alex and Dr. Allen -- a Bates Study Proposed</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>drjudy65</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3776</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3776</guid>
      <description>... He passed away in 2003. http://www.indiana.edu/~bfc/docs/circulars/05-06/B7-2006.pdf Likely he would have been interested, as am I, in seeing the published</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alex and Dr. Allen -- a Bates Study Proposed</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3775</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3775</guid>
      <description>Dear Engineer/Scientists Subject: Changing the refractive STATE of the eye by &#43;1.5 diopters. Alex had made an excellent statement. Do you think Merrill would</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stay close to what Dr. Bates ACTUALLY SAID about Donders/Helmholtz</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:45:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3773</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3773</guid>
      <description>Subject: There are to many people who put &quot;words&quot; in Dr. Bates mouth, and the condemn him for what he never said or believed. Here is the review of what Dr.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Otis totally supports optometrists -- Second-opnion that is.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>drjudy65</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3769</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3769</guid>
      <description>... But it has been proven otherwise.  In studies that I have provided to Otis human eyes have not acted like monkey eyes.  In fact, not even all species of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Otis totally supports optometrists -- Second-opnion that is.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alex Eulenberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3768</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3768</guid>
      <description>... By &quot;fundamental eye&quot; Otis means &quot;a healthy eye of any vertebrate.&quot; Otis takes the scientist&#39;s position that any effect observed in a population of healthy</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Optometry Student Explains how to use an Autorefractor.</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:54:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3767</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3767</guid>
      <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrzjPQVHIaA Enjoy, Otis</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Otis totally supports optometrists -- Second-opnion that is.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>drjudy65</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3765</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3765</guid>
      <description>... Yes I have said that a minus lens, prescribed to correct existing myopia in humans will not have an effect on refractive error. That limited statement is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Otis totally supports optometrists -- Second-opnion that is.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alex Eulenberg</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3764</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3764</guid>
      <description>... Judy, you have expressed the opinion many times that a minus lens will not alter the refractive state of a child in any way, by reference to experiments</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Otis totally supports optometrists -- Second-opnion that is.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
      <link>http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3763</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Myopiafree2/message/3763</guid>
      <description>Dear Judy, I have told you many times that you do not respect the SECOND-OPINON. Are you clear on that point? Prevention best, Otis</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov  8 19:03:29 PST 2009 -->
