<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NebraskaInfoWomen at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/</link>
    <description>Nebraska InfoWomen</description>

    <item>
      <title>Amanda Mueller</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>kp9x7</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/709</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/709</guid>
      <description>In a sweater her &quot;additions&quot; are spectacular.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: infamous</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/708</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/708</guid>
      <description>I still have never heard of her ... From: Dale Kaup To: NebraskaInfoWomen@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 10:52 AM Subject:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>infamous</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:01:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Dale Kaup</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/707</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/707</guid>
      <description>I think you are using the word infamous incorrectly. infamous:having a bad reputation; of bad report; notoriously vile; detestable</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hey</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:12:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/706</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/706</guid>
      <description>Infamous? I&#39;ve never heard of her. Now - for prime pictures would be Melissa Fry dressed to strengths (.) (.) ... From: smart_deep_brown To:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hey</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>smart_deep_brown</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/705</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/705</guid>
      <description>Where are the pics of the infamous Cindi Berger?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KETV has a new weather lady...here&#39;s Melissa Hoeman!</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:13:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/704</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/704</guid>
      <description>She is no Candace Sorenson. Candace is great TV. This one....not so much. ... From: damon To: NebraskaInfoWomen@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 14,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: KETV has a new weather lady...here&#39;s Melissa Hoeman!</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 01:54:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Awees</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/703</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/703</guid>
      <description>... I wonder what happened to candice?  it looks like ketv will use her as a reporter also bad move in my opinion.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>KETV has a new weather lady...here&#39;s Melissa Hoeman!</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:16:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/702</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/702</guid>
      <description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tgm5mTiSZ1Y</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Added a couple of Jaime McCutcheon just before whe went on maternity</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/701</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/701</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Amanda Mueller engaged???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:59:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/700</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/700</guid>
      <description>I don&#39;t know. They sure look bigger to me. I doubt she has a tattoo considering the comment she made last night about tattoos on people in their industry.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Amanda Mueller engaged???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:47:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>damon</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/699</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/699</guid>
      <description>... I&#39;m not convinced she had one.  The possibility has been mentioned for some time, yet since this talk started, she&#39;s never gone out of her way to show at</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Amanda Mueller engaged???</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:11:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/698</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/698</guid>
      <description>I think ring came along about the same time as her boob job. Which, by the way, they look spectacular. From a wardrobe point of view, let&#39;s see how she handles</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amanda Mueller engaged???</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>timlundy17</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/697</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/697</guid>
      <description>Did Amanda Mueller just get engaged??? I just noticed a ring on her finger for the first time tonight...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jamie McCutcheon</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:11:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Peterson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/696</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/696</guid>
      <description>She looks like she is 14 months pregnant. I assume she is due soon. ... From: damonhynes To: NebraskaInfoWomen@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 15,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Jamie McCutcheon</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>damonhynes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/695</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tv.groups.yahoo.com/group/NebraskaInfoWomen/message/695</guid>
      <description>I know she must be miserable now, but lawdy she looks fine!</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Mar 28 13:11:13 PDT 2010 -->
