<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>OriginsTalk at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/</link>
    <description>OriginTalk Discussion Group</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism: Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pasha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19099</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19099</guid>
      <description>Geobub writes:  Once again, I did not think I needed to be more clear.  Evolution was created with the intent to counter the Judeo-Christian creation account.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>VictorM</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19098</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19098</guid>
      <description>... We simply do not know about the sea creature - what they ate because the Bible does not state. However, the carnivores probably started after the flood -</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Woldviews based on fundamentalism: Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pasha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19097</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19097</guid>
      <description>Jim writes:  Since no one actually knows how biological evolution occurred over the eons, there is no science that describes it. Something can&#39;t be described</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>VictorM</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19096</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19096</guid>
      <description>... I did not invent biblical physics and it is not a theory. It is simply a literal acceptance of the words of The Bible as a principle of physics. I simply</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism: Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gluadys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19095</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19095</guid>
      <description>... Oh, you can be a great deal more clear.  After all &quot;evolution&quot; is a term used in many contexts:  biological evolution, stellar evolution, the evolution of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pasha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19094</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19094</guid>
      <description>Geobubs speculates:  Just for giggles, if DNA is a patternmakers template then transitional species you claim to observe may not be transitional but instead</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snowflakes and straw men</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Turandot1125</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19093</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19093</guid>
      <description>... Which is so much tilting at one&#39;s own silly straw men. Paul Davies, _The Fifth Miracle: The Search for the Origin and Meaning of Life_ / Simon &amp; Schuster /</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wiker and Darwin Part Two</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pasha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19092</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19092</guid>
      <description>Jim writes:  On what basis would he say [snowflakes] are directed (meaning guided by a purposive intelligence)?  We have no experience of any material causes</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Darwin&#39;s &quot;Sexual Selection&quot; promoted human evolution as self-cre</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>gluadys</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19091</guid>
      <description>... I wouldn&#39;t have much of a problem with Darwin&#39;s use of &quot;race&quot; either, except that he considered all &quot;races&quot;  (French and Irish included) as &quot;inferior&quot; to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wiker and Darwin Part Two</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jayjay4547</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19090</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19090</guid>
      <description>... I had a look at Sander Gliboff&#39;s critique of From Darwin to Hitler that you linked to above. His piece will only impress people who are already inclined to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism: Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:07:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Goff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19089</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19089</guid>
      <description>WORLDVIEWS.... Pasha: &quot;The theory of evolution is the foundation upon which the entire edifice of biological science is constructed.&quot; Given that most fields of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:35:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>geobubs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19088</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19088</guid>
      <description>VICTOR: Thank you for your post. Science observes unchanging axioms that somewhat like the unchanging Biblical principles. In my science training I do not</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Woldviews based on fundamentalism: Evolution</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:35:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jim Goff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19087</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19087</guid>
      <description>WORLDVIEWS gluadys: &quot;...my overall impression is that you (geobubs) have not yet clarified what you have in mind by &#39;evolution&#39;.&quot; Given your own often</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:34:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>geobubs</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19086</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19086</guid>
      <description>... Gluadys: You continually make the assumption that Evolution is a truth and factual. Yet there are more holes and frauds in the theory than truths. Getting</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Worldviews based on fundamentalism</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Pasha</dc:creator>
      <link>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19085</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OriginsTalk/message/19085</guid>
      <description>I would like to propose &quot;Biblical Physics&quot; should be renamed Victor&#39;s theory, or &quot;Victor&#39;s Biblical Physics,&quot; after its leading proponent.  This will help</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sat Nov 21 10:41:20 PST 2009 -->
