http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/ Richter/Wintellect Power Threading Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:44:14 GMT sgcvision http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/614 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/614 I have designed a class that acts like Figure 2 in your article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc721613.aspx (except I'm working with a Windows Form Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:46:52 GMT Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/613 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/613 You are right about everything. If you care about catching an unhandled exception thrown from within the iterator, you need a try around the EndExecute method Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:43:55 GMT sgcvision http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/612 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/612 I think I need a better understanding the AsyncCallback parameter of AsyncEnumerator.BeginExecute(). I understand that to be a callback method that the ae will Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:28:06 GMT Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/611 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/611 The exception is being thrown from with9in an EndXxx method. You just have to put the EndXxx method in a try block and then you can catch the SocketException. Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:07:45 GMT tmather99 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/610 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/610 I'm playing around with the TcpServer example, and discovered that if the client terminated unexpectedly, TcpServer throw an exception inside Process() method Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:38:21 GMT Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/609 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/609 The AsyncEnumerator never creates or spawns any thread on its own. I have not had to do what you are trying to do but what ever you would normally do should Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:35:45 GMT king_perseus http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/608 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/608 I'am using AsyncEnumerator to marshall calls into code paths that ultimately touch COM components, Wndows Imaging Components (WIC) to be exact. Calls to COM Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:53:04 GMT Jiri Cincura http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/607 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/607 Hi Jeffrey, your proposal looks interesting. On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 17:48, Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) ... From top of my head, what about some time Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:48:26 GMT Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/606 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/606 I'm thinking of adding a feature to my AsyncEnumerator that would allow you to register two delegates with each AE object. The first "SuspendCallback delegate" Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:18:32 GMT Paul Cross http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/605 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/605 Thanks Jeffrey. I'm managing concurrent access to an old-school out-of-proc COM server so the standard .NET Mutex was the route I followed. All working fine Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:55:55 GMT Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/604 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/604 Usually, developers name a mutex so that it can be shared across process or AppDomain boundaries. However, my ResourceLock base class contains state that is Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:56:28 GMT Paul Cross http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/603 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/603 Hi, I'm struggling with using the library. Is there any way of creating a named mutex? Thanks, Paul Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:17:37 GMT Jeffrey Richter (Wintellect LLC) http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/602 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/602 I've been doing a lot of work with the new Task class that ships with .NET 4.0 as I've been revising my CLR via C# book (due out in early 2010). Task are Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:45:30 GMT tmather99 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/601 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/601 I'm keep getting the same error dialog whenever I tried to change the Wintellect.Threading.Silverlight.dll reference inside VS2008 SP1 for the Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:13:08 GMT Charles Prakash Dasari http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/600 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PowerThreading/message/600 Great, that answers my questions. Thank you Jeff! From: PowerThreading@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PowerThreading@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Richter