PretCosmos at Yahoo! Groups

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Jan M. Logsdon — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:07:21 GMT

[Dan] And be careful, because being raised up and sitting in heavenly places was already a reality for NT saints, not just a Parousial promise. So it cannot be

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

larrysiegle — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:47:44 GMT

[Dan] The resurrection was only possible BECAUSE of the ... the resurrection. [Larry] I absolutely agree with what you stated about the "salvific work of

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Daniel E Harden — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:12:37 GMT

[Mike] ... [Dan] I know. I do wish you'd have at least read the part where I responded to your defense of your article. [Mike] ... [Dan] They are the same,

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Daniel E Harden — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:12:37 GMT

[Larry] Any form of PHYSICAL Rapture of the saints violates the consistent principles of hermeneutics. I respect Ed Stevens and J.S. Russell, but in this

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Daniel E Harden — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:12:34 GMT

Dave, I'm rather surprised at this line of questioning, because it really is no different than what you yourself believe, in that the "snatching" is the same

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Daniel E Harden — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:12:34 GMT

[Dave] ... [Dan] Wow. How odd you saying that. Actually, you are quite incorrect. Whenever we see the idea of a "resurrection" in the OT - including even

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

larrysiegle — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:24:05 GMT

So, Tim LaHaye is correct in his "Left Behind" theology, he just missed the time of occurrence by a couple of thousand years and as it turns out WE are the

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Debra Wilson — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:11:47 GMT

... Deb: :-)..OK, thanks! Now I feel a bit dumb! ;-)

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

David A. Green — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:19:08 GMT

... Immortal Body at Death

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Debra Wilson — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:17:33 GMT

Hi :-)....I have to ask....WHAT is "IBD"? I don't have a clue. Thanks. Deb ... this ... with ... whether or ... eternal ... and ... must ... unbiblical. ...

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

David A. Green — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:31:30 GMT

Dan, Calling the resurrection from "death in sin" to "life in Christ" (a resurrection which all believers experience while they are alive on this Earth) a mere

Re: Second Coming hoax

John Paul — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:51:05 GMT

The Democrats with be whisked away. :) ... From: David A. Green Subject: [PretCosmos] Second Coming hoax To:

Re: Second Coming hoax

John Paul — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:50:50 GMT

The Democrats with me whisked away. :) ... From: David A. Green Subject: [PretCosmos] Second Coming hoax To:

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

Healinglvs@... — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:05:01 GMT

Dan, Sorry, but I didn't read all of your previous posts. If you could give me a brief response here: 1) In your view is the "redemption of the body" and

Re: Logical answer towards the fleshly resurrection concept

David A. Green — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 07:55:50 GMT

Okay Dan, is this correct? At the Second Coming of Christ, the dead Christians were raised out of Hades, then the living and dead Christians were snatched away