PrismAdvisors at Yahoo! Groups

Business Software

software8320 — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:28:43 GMT

Business Software http://www.soft-kingdom.com/Business/

Customer names for soma's post - NEED ASAP!

Glenn Block — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:12:53 GMT

Hi guys Soma is doing a post on Composite app guidance. There's one there, but we're getting it cleaned up and would like to add some customer references. If

Over 50,000 Free Software

software8320 — Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:41:09 GMT

Over 50,000 Free Software http://www.soft-kingdom.com/

Retrospective from today's advisor call

bob.brumfield — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:54:34 GMT

Here's the content of the retrospective from today's advisor call. Please respond and add other comments/refinement. -= What went well =- ++bi-weekly meetings

Re: Ship post

kentcb@... — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:51:43 GMT

Glenn, Well done to you and the team - this is great! Best, Kent On Thu 03/07/08 4:04 PM , Glenn Block gblock@... sent: W00T!

Ship post

Glenn Block — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:34:53 GMT

W00T! http://blogs.msdn.com/gblock/archive/2008/07/03/composite-application-guidance-is-live.aspx

Composite Application Guidance is live!

Glenn Block — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:27:14 GMT

We just shipped. You can download it at msdn.microsoft.com/compositewpf. It may take a bit to propogate to all of our servers. Thanks everyone, you made this

Shipping this week and advisory board meeting

Glenn Block — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:48:37 GMT

Hi All Thanks for being patient during our radio silence, as we've been extremely busy between shipping Prism. We dropped an RC release last week and are

Advisory Meeting

Glenn Block — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:17:46 GMT

Hi guys. Unfortunately we won't be meeting this week as I hinted. We're in the middle of trying to get Prism out the door. We're planning to ship by the end of

[SPAM?] RE: [PrismAdvisors] Re: Questioning the Subscribe method's

wardbell2004 — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:43:09 GMT

I find Derek's justification sufficiently convincing to drop my objection particularly in view of the low likelihood that many developers will launch a

Re: [SPAM?] RE: [PrismAdvisors] Re: Questioning the Subscribe metho

Brian Noyes — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:49:15 GMT

A well stated explanation of why we did it this way in the first place. From: PrismAdvisors@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PrismAdvisors@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of

Re: Questioning the Subscribe method's thread default

Derek Greer — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:41:19 GMT

There is certainly a measure of subjectively concerning what might be considered astonishing to any given individual, but I would submit that the principle of

Glenn & Brian's Presentation at Tech Ed 2008 was beautiful

wardbell2004 — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:36:39 GMT

The presentation was extremely effective and Prism shined. It would be great to have Glenn's final deck on CodePlex some where and to get a recording of the

Re: Questioning the Subscribe method's thread default

wardbell2004 — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:20:58 GMT

I had a completely different sense of "astonishment". I'm not saying you are wrong, Derek. I'm just imagining a different kind of developer. And that's what

Prism Documents (redux)

bob.brumfield — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:15:47 GMT

I've uploaded some of the documents to the Files section of the group. This includes: 10000 Foot View Bootstrapepr Technical Concept Command Technical