<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Q15X25 at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/</link>
    <description>Q15X25</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: 7.035Mhz USB Q15X25 VK4AKP-1 PBBS Kam XL Please leave Test MSG.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Brabham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/495</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/495</guid>
      <description>I ran it like PSK31, with my rig&#39;s power turned all the way up. I control the power out by adjusting the audio level going in to the Mic plug, and/or use the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7.035Mhz USB Q15X25 VK4AKP-1 PBBS Kam XL Please leave Test MSG.</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:53:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/494</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/494</guid>
      <description>Hi Charles. The answer to that is looking like yes. I say looking like because of the following. - The last Beta release allows for scaleing the modem between </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7.035Mhz USB Q15X25 VK4AKP-1 PBBS Kam XL Please leave Test MSG.</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Brabham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/493</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/493</guid>
      <description>Ken, can you adjust the parameters for a lower baud rate and have the modem scale down automatically, as previos Q15x25 implementations do? The reason I ask is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7.035Mhz USB Q15X25 VK4AKP-1 PBBS Kam XL Please leave Test MSG.</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 05:34:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/492</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/492</guid>
      <description>Hi Guys! Well, I&#39;m very pleased to say that I&#39;m testing Q15X25 NewQpsk on my Kam XL currently. Kantronics have given me some Beta firmware to test. (Please</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Q15x25 / HF Packet: was  HF TCP/IP</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:02:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Page</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/491</guid>
      <description>No actually. I just tried it now. HBaud 100/1200 failed. It&#39;s one of the big problems with these. It&#39;s amazing how advanced the Kam XL is, yet it&#39;s still so</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Q15x25 / HF Packet: was  HF TCP/IP</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:43:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jose A. Amador</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/490</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/490</guid>
      <description>... Understandable....are those KAM able to run 100 baud packet? It is preferable to have a drop falling all the time than many quick bursts that do not make</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Q15x25 / HF Packet: was  HF TCP/IP</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken Page</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/489</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/489</guid>
      <description>... Hum, that sounds strangely like the Kantronics Kam XL Dual Port, Flash upgradeable, DSP, TNC that has been available now for years. ;) ... Can&#39;t be too</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Q15x25 / HF Packet: was HF TCP/IP</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Bill Vodall WA7NWP</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/488</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/488</guid>
      <description>... Not at all locked in to any beaurocracy...  The SCS devices natively support TCP/IP as well as a &quot;legacy&quot; protocol that&#39;s both open source and (probably)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Q15x25 / HF Packet: was  HF TCP/IP</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:12:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>stevenstimpson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/487</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/487</guid>
      <description>... with ... A TNC IS an embedded PC. Even my crustly old MFJ is a self contained communications device. WHat stops it from being flexible is FIRMware, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Baud rate (was Re: [Q15X25] Re: Kantronics, Kam XL)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jose A. Amador</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/486</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/486</guid>
      <description>The efforts I am seeing might indicate that we are attempting to bite a bit too large.... On one side, the reports that Q15X25 works better at 2300 baud, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Q15x25 / HF Packet: was  HF TCP/IP</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Brabham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/485</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/485</guid>
      <description>Howdy, Ken! I think that in both the short and long run, we will be better off with the embedded PC&#39;s than we will be with TNC&#39;s. This, in light of the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kantronics, Kam XL</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Brabham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/484</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/484</guid>
      <description>... Q15x25 has demonstrated that AX25 need not be packet. - In fact there are several digital modes that could be operated over AX25 just as Tomi has done with</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: anyone out there</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Charles Brabham</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/483</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/483</guid>
      <description>Don&#39;t forget &#39;newqpsk&#39; mode for FlexNet&#39;s Flex32. It has no waterfall display but on the other hand it allows you to gateway Q15x25 directly to packet, through</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: anyone out there</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/482</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/482</guid>
      <description>Hi Karel! As far as I can work out Q15X25 is supported within MixW and AGWPE (AGW Packet Engine) for windows. You might want to try AGW as there is some very</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kantronics, Kam XL</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/481</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Q15X25/message/481</guid>
      <description>Well some bad news today after so long a effort of trying to get this damn mode into current technology like the Kam XL. A response from Tomi to my request to</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Feb 14 02:21:02 PST 2010 -->
