<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>QM_from_GR at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/</link>
    <description>QM from GR: 4-geons and more...</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Inherent stability of Rutherford&#39;s nuclear model of the hydrogen</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. Abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1133</guid>
      <description>Hi Mark You are quite right in that electrons moving in a circular path, in a synchtrotron, emit radiation. In the synchrotron the accelerating electric field</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inherent stability of Rutherford&#39;s nuclear model of the hydrogen</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. Abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1132</guid>
      <description>Hi Mark May be not exactly circular Musa D. Abdullahi To: QM_from_GR@yahoogroups.com From: mark.hadley@... Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:29:43 &#43;0100 </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inherent stability of Rutherford&#39;s nuclear model of the hydrogen</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:35:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hadley, Mark</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1131</guid>
      <description>you are simply wrong. A synchrotron works exactly from the radiation from electrons moving in a circle. Cheers Mark ________________________________ From:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inherent stability of Rutherford&#39;s nuclear model of the hydrogen ato</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1130</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1130</guid>
      <description>Sir Ernest Rutherford’s (1911) model of the hydrogen atom consists of a negatively charged electron revolving in a circular orbit round a heavy positively</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: An explanation of inertia of a body</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:34:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Blair Smith</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1129</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1129</guid>
      <description>Hi all QM_from_GR&#39;ers :-) I recall reading about similar hypotheses before, they were reported in the general literature a few years ago. In the spirit of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An explanation of inertia of a body</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1128</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1128</guid>
      <description>Inertia is the tendency of a body to resist being accelerated or decelerated. An accelerated charged particle creates an electrodynamic field proportional to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the Electrodynamics of a Moving Particle Accelerated to the Speed</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1127</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1127</guid>
      <description>A book on an electrodynamics for a charged particle accelerated, by an electrostatic field, to the speed of light, with constant mass and with emission of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the universe really that complex</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:27:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Paul Rochford</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1126</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1126</guid>
      <description>Ever since my graduation (30 years ago} from two reasonable English red brick universities, as an applied mathematician, I have puzzled over the beauty yet</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One paper accepted, another one rejected!</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Strayhorn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1125</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1125</guid>
      <description>Hello all, I figured I&#39;d give an update on my various papers. The one that I resubmitted to Les Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie got accepted -- my</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Newton Was Correct, Gravitation Is Electrical</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:22:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1124</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1124</guid>
      <description>The forces of repulsion and attraction between the (equal number of positive and negative) electric charges in two separate (neutral) bodies, being</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>draft of my next paper, with quantitative simulation of Aspect DDC E</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Strayhorn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1123</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1123</guid>
      <description>Hello everyone, I have uploaded a revised draft of a paper that I intend to submit to Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, entitled: </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>AN EXTENSION OF COULOMB&#39;S LAW TO A MOVING CHARGED PARTICLE</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Musa D. abdullahi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1122</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1122</guid>
      <description>1.         Coulomb&#39;s law in electrostatics, is perhaps, the most significant law in physics. Physicists generally believe that this law, giving the force of</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is this an acceptance or a rejection letter???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:28:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Hadley, Mark</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1121</guid>
      <description>Dear David, Well done; I read it as an initiation to make corrections and resubmit. If I were you, I would try to agree with the editor that you will make</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is this an acceptance or a rejection letter???</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Strayhorn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1120</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1120</guid>
      <description>I just got this email today regarding one of the two manuscripts (archived at http://www.philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=27) I submitted to AFLB on</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>paper on CTCs as basis for QM</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 07:23:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>David Strayhorn</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1119</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/QM_from_GR/message/1119</guid>
      <description>VERY interesting paper -- Mark expecially might like it because it is inspired by Kip Thorne&#39;s work on closed timelike curves: An amusing analogy: modelling</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Jan  6 04:17:10 PST 2010 -->
