<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>QuantextMC at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/</link>
    <description>Quantext Portfolio &amp; Retirement Planner</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:48:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2136</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2136</guid>
      <description>Hi all: QPP projects volatility and then computes expected return based on a linear relationship between risk and return.  The slope of this line is determined</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commodity ETF projections</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:38:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2135</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2135</guid>
      <description>The basic issue is that commodities may not have the equity risk premium--this is just not well grounded in theory.  See the Ibbotson study in the links</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:12:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yates1847</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2134</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2134</guid>
      <description>I think Lowell is clearly on the right track, at least as far as non-equity or fixed income securities are concerned.  I tried an experiment with the projected</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Commodity ETF projections</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:52:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>yates1847</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2133</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2133</guid>
      <description>Yes, I believe that is what Geoff meant.  Look at his article called &quot;Outlooks for Some Sector ETF&#39;s&quot; at the bottom of page 3 and top of page 4 (the pdf file</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2131</guid>
      <description>Yes, I read your question and the follow up responses.  I&#39;m still not satisfied with the &quot;straight line&quot; results that come out of plotting Return vs. Risk data</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>investor952</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2130</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2130</guid>
      <description>It looks like uzzk23a  in the post right above yours already found it...along with responses from Geoff.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:14:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2129</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2129</guid>
      <description>Investor952, If you are unable to locate your former post, would you please articulate it again.  I missed it last time, likely due to not being ready to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>uzzk23a</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2128</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2128</guid>
      <description>see  http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/471</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2127</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2127</guid>
      <description>Do you recall the approximate date when you posted your comment on the projected return/projected risk ratio? How sophisticated can these projections be if</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PRPFX and individual stocks</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:03:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>investor952</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2126</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2126</guid>
      <description>PRPFX appears to be an interesting stand alone investment...including stocks, bonds, cash, gold &amp; silver...and i think the current prpfx also includes foreign</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>prpfx: if it ain&#39;t broke...don&#39;t fix it</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>investor952</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2125</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2125</guid>
      <description>prpfx versus the sp500 over past 5 years http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&amp;s=PRPFX&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=&amp;c=^GSPC</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Harry Browne and REITs</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>investor952</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2124</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2124</guid>
      <description>I just found the following at the Boglehead site: http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15434 &quot;Harry Browne didn&#39;t consider real estate specifically</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>investor952</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2123</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2123</guid>
      <description>I made this point in a much earlier posting.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Return vs. SD Graph</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2122</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2122</guid>
      <description>If one takes a group of ETFs and plots the projected return vs. the projected standard deviation, the graph is essentially a straight line.  Why is this the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WANTED: People To Work From Home. Must Have Computer</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>sampa25bus@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2121</guid>
      <description>WANTED: People To Work From Home. Must Have Computer * Just fill simple surveys. Start today. Online Companies Will Pay YOU $5 to $125 for Each Survey! Get</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Wed Dec  2 02:30:36 PST 2009 -->
