<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>QuantextMC at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/</link>
    <description>Quantext Portfolio &amp; Retirement Planner</description>

    <item>
      <title>Article relating to the Siegel v Bodie argument</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>welch-family-7571@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2106</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2106</guid>
      <description>http://www.marketwatch.com/story/story/print?guid=5DE1C33E-3261-487C-89E4-C5BFE80F5C74 &quot;A better risk measure, however, would be this: Shortfall risk equals</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Errors in the Options Article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>quantext2002@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2105</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2105</guid>
      <description>The 9.3 ratio is not for the current 2.2 year option prices you cite, but rather for the two year option.  I discussed the price of the current 2.2 year option</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Errors in the Options Article</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jshultz73</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2104</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2104</guid>
      <description>Greetings, Ok. Admittedly there are several points of confusion.  Still 109/13.9 is not 9.3 as written up. No calculator needed. Thanks for your help and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Errors in the Options Article</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>quantext2002</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2103</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2103</guid>
      <description>Dear Sir: You have made a mistake.  Options are sold in lots such that you buy a single contract that is for options on 100 shares.  This is true.  But options</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Errors in the Options Article</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jshultz73</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2102</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2102</guid>
      <description>My apologies.  I think with a delta of .5 you would get an initial leverage of about 4:1 based on your numbers. cheers, off to bed!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Errors in the Options Article</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jshultz73</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2101</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2101</guid>
      <description>Greetings Dr. Considine, In my enthusiasm for your options research, i think i missed some errors.  Your calculations for the number of options contracts I</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New article(s) on creating a floor on portfolio losses from equi</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:25:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>uzzk23a</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2100</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2100</guid>
      <description>Is it possible to use off-the-shelf QPP to analyze this strategy ?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dow was down 250 today..</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>investor952</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2099</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2099</guid>
      <description>prpfx was up today...interesting</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New article(s) on creating a floor on portfolio losses from equi</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:14:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jshultz73</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2098</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2098</guid>
      <description>Also in terms of future considerations, you will want to consider use of call spreads. You will have a higher yearly win rate and won&#39;t be so sensitive to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The Retirement Portfolio Showdown</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>quantext2002</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2097</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2097</guid>
      <description>These charts were generated with an EXCEL module for generating correlated returns in the Files section and the average returns, standard deviation, and</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New article(s) on creating a floor on portfolio losses from equi</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>quantext2002</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2096</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2096</guid>
      <description>Great post to lead to a second article--thanks for listing so many of the additional practical issues.  The issue of when to take profits is interesting (if at</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New article(s) on creating a floor on portfolio losses from equi</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>frankbiff</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2095</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2095</guid>
      <description>In order to implement this strategy some details need to be worked out. - It would probably be best to have a ladder of options with different expiration&#39;s,</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New article(s) on creating a floor on portfolio losses from equi</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>jshultz73</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2094</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2094</guid>
      <description>Great article. One of your best yet!  This is the way of the future.  Good to see that you are analyzing it. I was looking at the ETF RZV for a high beta call</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Retirement Portfolio Showdown</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2093</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2093</guid>
      <description>Geoff, In your  paper, &quot;The Retirement Portfolio Showdown: Jeremy Siegel v. Zvi Bodie&quot; you generated several graphs of returns vs. percentile to make the point</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: check out PRPFX</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:21:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Lowell Herr</dc:creator>
      <link>http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2092</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/QuantextMC/message/2092</guid>
      <description>Geoff, I am interested in what ETFs you might use to model the Harry Browne Permanent Portfolio.  I just ran an analysis using VTI for stocks, GLD and SLV for</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Dec  4 14:17:49 PST 2009 -->
