<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RFT at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/</link>
    <description>Relational Frame Theory</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: Pliance</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jen Plumb</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2402</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2402</guid>
      <description>Hi Ivan, Actually, the example you used is more like tracking, if I follow you correctly. Tracking means that the reinforcer is provided through the organism&#39;s</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pliance</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>ivancicmartin</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2401</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2401</guid>
      <description>I have a question about &quot;pliance.&quot; I know pliance is considered a rule (a ply) with a contingency or consequence active in the verbal community.  Do readers</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ambiguous networks</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steven Hayes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2400</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2400</guid>
      <description>Jennifer Quinones is writing up an RFT study that created coherent and ambiguous networks to see how they work. Nice data. But we have a couple of points we</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Beutler Article</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steven Hayes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2399</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2399</guid>
      <description>Larry is on to the right problem and has been for many years. I consider his voice an ally to the CBS wing. But he is trying to solve it without commitment to</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Beutler Article</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Kordonski</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2398</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2398</guid>
      <description>A colleague gave me an article by Larry Beutler entitled &quot;Making Science Matter in Clinical Practice: Redefining Psychotherapy.&quot; It is a long article but in it</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Dialectic</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:33:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Kordonski</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2397</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2397</guid>
      <description>I believe it was Hegel who said the intellectual history of the West could be seen as the tension between a thesis and antithesis to be resolved by a</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [acceptanceandcommitmenttherapy] How to create your own metaphor</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:49:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matthieu Villatte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2396</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2396</guid>
      <description>For some reason, the attachement doesn&#39;t seem to work for everybody so I posted the article on the ACBS site. http://contextualpsychology.org/node/4662 Best, </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to create your own metaphors with RFT</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Matthieu Villatte</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2395</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2395</guid>
      <description>Hi all, As some of you may know, Jean-Louis Monestès and I started to edit a French webmag on ACT a bit less than 2 years ago to present our approach in an</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IAT in the news</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Weil, Timothy</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2394</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2394</guid>
      <description>Hi all, just got this via web update.  Thought some would be interested in reading a bit of popular coverage of IAT. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RFT &amp; Milton Erickson&#39;s use of language in Hypnosis</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>T. Gustafsson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2393</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2393</guid>
      <description>Hi Gary! I&#39;ve thought about the connection but/and haven&#39;t done anything more. Neuro-linguistic programming is a bunch of techniques without evidence but the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RFT &amp; Milton Erickson&#39;s use of language in Hypnosis</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2392</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2392</guid>
      <description>Has anyone done any exploration into RFT and Milton Erickson&#39;s use of language in hypnotic trance induction. I&#39;m an ACT clinician and have been looking into</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>in search of RFT fact sheet</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:43:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>joseph_ciarrochi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2391</guid>
      <description>Folks, we in australia and new zealand are about to have a conference with over 300 people, and we want to try to inform people about RFT and the evidence</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [acceptanceandcommitmenttherapy] suppression and distraction</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:13:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Robb, Harold B.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2390</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2390</guid>
      <description>I&#39;d like to suggest that it also depends on what one understands by &quot;mindfulness.&quot; I would suggest &quot;mindfulness&quot; has two phases. The first is building the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [acceptanceandcommitmenttherapy] suppression and distraction</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer L. Boulanger</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2389</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2389</guid>
      <description>Thanks to all who replied backchannel with paper suggestions. Once this grant app is submitted I&#39;ll return to the lists with a summary of this literature. </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [acceptanceandcommitmenttherapy] suppression and distraction</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:59:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Russ Harris</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2388</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2388</guid>
      <description>My 2 cents: &#39;mindfulness&#39; techniques are defined by function (i.e. the underlying purpose, the intended consequences) not by form. If the function of a given</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr1.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Sun Nov  8 11:46:46 PST 2009 -->
