<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RFT at Yahoo! Groups</title>
    <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/</link>
    <description>Relational Frame Theory</description>

    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy) and transcendent sense of self</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Andreas Larsson</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2435</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2435</guid>
      <description>Deictics is the name we&#39;ve given the through MET aquired ability to notice these perspectives. I don&#39;t think there can be a sense of transcendent self or even</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy) and transcendent sense of self</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roger Vilardaga</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2434</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2434</guid>
      <description>It’s exciting what you describe about Darin’s data and what he’s found about the order of acquisition of the different relational repertoires. Do you</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy) and transcendent sense of self</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Daniel J. Moran, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2433</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2433</guid>
      <description>Just musing on the railroad into NYC for abct:  what natural everyday regular old events would evoke the repertoire of contacting the SaC? I imagine this is</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy) and transcendent sense of self</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:41:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>joseph_ciarrochi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2432</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2432</guid>
      <description>Thanks, J.t. Is it correct to say deictic framing is fairly sophisticated and many folks can not do it with proficiency (As Darin C suggested)? If so, then</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy) and transcendent sense of self</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:27:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>J. T. Blackledge</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2431</guid>
      <description>Hi Joseph— Cool thoughts.  I think by definition, self as context explicitly involves deictic framing—i.e., when you ‘adapt a sense of self as</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy) and transcendent sense of self</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:27:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>joseph_ciarrochi</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2430</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2430</guid>
      <description>Hi Roger et al, Darin Cairns is collecting a mass of data with autistic kids on when different frames appear. This data won&#39;t tell us the age that different</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:25:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roger Vilardaga</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2429</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2429</guid>
      <description>Hi again – Louise came to the rescue. This is what she replied to me: Roger, I would be very surprised if an 18 month old was doing any deictic framing. In</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roger Vilardaga</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2428</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2428</guid>
      <description>Hi Rainer - I&#39;m really curious to hear about Tim&#39;s, Louise&#39;s, Darin, Nick Berens&#39;, or other&#39;s take on this issue, since I&#39;m sure they have a clearer </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mluciano@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2427</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2427</guid>
      <description>In regard the connection ACT-RFT that Miguel Caio was asking, here are some more published experimental papers with ACT-RFT connections (one is attached). </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>raisonn@...</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2426</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2426</guid>
      <description>Hi Roger, you are right. Other forms of relational framing may be involved. And I thought that a conceptualization mainly in terms of coordination framing</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roger Vilardaga</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2425</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2425</guid>
      <description>Hi Rainer – You say “by a DOMINATION of framing coordinately”, and I take your choice of words to mean that you are aware that other forms of relational</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Roger Vilardaga</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2424</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2424</guid>
      <description>Hi Joseph - this is an interesting articles by de Waal that provides an answer to your question from a different tradition. Sorry for the highlighting and the</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>William Kordonski</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2423</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2423</guid>
      <description>I guess I should have been more clear. I did not see my grandchild&#39;s response as deictic framing but deictic framing as a skill that is as yet to be learned by</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Tony Biglan</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2422</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2422</guid>
      <description>Has Vilardga published on this? If so I would like to see the paper. From: RFT@yahoogroups.com [mailto:RFT@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Hayes Sent:</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ACT paper...(and empathy)</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Steven Hayes</dc:creator>
      <link>http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2421</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RFT/message/2421</guid>
      <description>you could probably get it that way as well re Bill&#39;s first message I think you can have empathy without deictics of a sort but with deictics it can increase a</description>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
<!-- wr2.grp.sp2.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Thu Dec 17 13:19:16 PST 2009 -->
